The Adiana System for permanent contraception: safety and efficacy at 3 years
- PMID: 21803664
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.002
The Adiana System for permanent contraception: safety and efficacy at 3 years
Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the Adiana System for preventing pregnancy in women desiring permanent sterilization.
Design: This study is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, international trial. The primary endpoint was pregnancy prevention rate at 12 months. Pregnancy prevention rates at 24 and 36 months were also calculated (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Setting: The study was conducted at 16 sites, 14 in the United States, 1 in Australia, and 1 in Mexico.
Patients: A total of 645 women (intent-to-treat group).
Intervention: Hysteroscopic placement of polymer matrix was attempted in all patients. Tubal occlusion confirmed by hysterosalpingography at 12 weeks. Ongoing monitoring for pregnancy over 36 months.
Measurements and main results: There was a 95% bilateral matrix placement rate and 88.4% bilateral occlusion by hysterosalpingography, as previously reported. A total of 24 968 person-months of wearing were accrued. Pregnancy prevention rates were summarized with descriptive statistics by use of 95% two-sided confidence interval on the basis of life-table methods. Complete 36-month data were available for 481 subjects. During the first year, 6 pregnancies were reported. Three were determined to be the result of misinterpretation of hysterosalpingography results. The remaining 3 were attributed to method failure, as were the 3 pregnancies during the second year. No additional pregnancies occurred in year 3. The cumulative pregnancy prevention rates at 12, 24, and 36 months compare favorably with data from the Collaborative Review of Sterilization study and other published reports documenting efficacy of established permanent sterilization procedures.
Conclusions: These data demonstrate that the efficacy of the Adiana System for pregnancy prevention is similar to other permanent sterilization methods.
Copyright © 2011 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Hysteroscopic Essure Inserts for Permanent Contraception: Extended Follow-Up Results of a Phase III Multicenter International Study.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):951-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 Apr 24. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25917278 Clinical Trial.
-
The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 13;336(11):762-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703133361104. N Engl J Med. 1997. PMID: 9052654
-
Radiofrequency global endometrial ablation followed by hysteroscopic sterilization.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.01.014. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17630170 Clinical Trial.
-
Transcervical sterilization.Semin Reprod Med. 2010 Mar;28(2):103-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248134. Epub 2010 Mar 29. Semin Reprod Med. 2010. PMID: 20352559 Review.
-
Permanent sterilization for the 21st century using the hysteroscopic approach.Surg Technol Int. 2004;13:115-9. Surg Technol Int. 2004. PMID: 15744682 Review.
Cited by
-
Procedural and clinical outcomes of Adiana® hysteroscopic tubal occlusion in the Netherlands.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Dec;16(4):441-447. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.4.050. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024. PMID: 39718327 Free PMC article.
-
Is there a future for hysteroscopic sterilisation?Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Dec;16(4):379-381. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.4.053. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024. PMID: 39718322 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical