Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;193(19):5347-58.
doi: 10.1128/JB.05469-11. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

Interaction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis elongation factor Tu with GTP is regulated by phosphorylation

Affiliations

Interaction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis elongation factor Tu with GTP is regulated by phosphorylation

Andaleeb Sajid et al. J Bacteriol. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

During protein synthesis, translation elongation factor Tu (Ef-Tu) is responsible for the selection and binding of the cognate aminoacyl-tRNA to the acceptor site on the ribosome. The activity of Ef-Tu is dependent on its interaction with GTP. Posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation, are known to regulate the activity of Ef-Tu in several prokaryotes. Although a study of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis phosphoproteome showed Ef-Tu to be phosphorylated, the role of phosphorylation in the regulation of Ef-Tu has not been studied. In this report, we show that phosphorylation of M. tuberculosis Ef-Tu (MtbEf-Tu) by PknB reduced its interaction with GTP, suggesting a concomitant reduction in the level of protein synthesis. Overexpression of PknB in Mycobacterium smegmatis indeed reduced the level of protein synthesis. MtbEf-Tu was found to be phosphorylated by PknB on multiple sites, including Thr118, which is required for optimal activity of the protein. We found that kirromycin, an Ef-Tu-specific antibiotic, had a significant effect on the nucleotide binding of unphosphorylated MtbEf-Tu but not on the phosphorylated protein. Our results show that the modulation of the MtbEf-Tu-GTP interaction by phosphorylation can have an impact on cellular protein synthesis and growth. These results also suggest that phosphorylation can change the sensitivity of the protein to the specific inhibitors. Thus, the efficacy of an inhibitor can also depend on the posttranslational modification(s) of the target and should be considered during the development of the molecule.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Role of PknB in the regulation of protein synthesis and the phosphorylation of MtbEf-Tu in M. smegmatis. (A) Graphical representation of [35S]Met incorporation into proteins of M. smegmatis cells overexpressing PknB or PknBK40M. The PknB-overexpressing strain showed ∼25% less incorporation of [35S]Met than the PknBK40M-overexpressing strain when equal concentrations of the lysates were taken. The experiment was repeated four times; error bars represent standard deviations of four individual readings. (B) His12-MtbEf-Tu was purified from M. smegmatis and was phosphoenriched. The enriched protein was assessed for phosphorylation by immunoblotting with anti-pThr antibodies. Lane 1, phosphoenriched sample; lane 2, PknBc (positive control); lane 3, GST (negative control). (C) The phosphoenriched sample of MtbEf-Tu purified from M. smegmatis was also probed with anti-MtbEf-Tu antibodies. Lane 1, MtbEf-Tuphos (positive control); lane 2, GST (negative control); lane 3, phosphoenriched sample. (D) Autoradiogram showing the in vitro phosphorylation of MtbEf-Tu (5 μg) by PknBc (0.5 μg) in kinase buffer containing 2 μCi [γ-32P]ATP. Samples were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and were analyzed with a phosphorimager.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Phosphorylation of MtbEf-Tu and identification of phosphorylation sites. (A) MtbEf-Tu was coexpressed with either PknB or PknBK40M in E. coli, and the phosphorylation status of purified MtbEf-Tu was analyzed by Western blotting using anti-pThr antibodies. (Top) Ponceau-stained nitrocellulose membrane; (bottom) immunoblot. Lane 1, PstPc (negative control); lane 2, PknBc (positive control); lane 3, MtbEf-Tu coexpressed with PknBK40M (MtbEf-Tuunphos)); lane 4, MtbEf-Tu coexpressed with PknB (MtbEf-Tuphos); lane 6, molecular size markers. (B) Phosphorylated species in MtbEf-Tuunphos (left) and MtbEf-Tuphos (right) were separated by bidirectional PAGE, and the proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and were blotted with anti-pThr (α-pThr) and anti-MtbEf-Tu antibodies. Additional spots were probed for MtbEf-Tuphos, while no such spots were observed with MtbEf-Tuunphos. (C) Phosphoamino acid analysis of MtbEf-Tu phosphorylated by PknBc was performed by 2D-TLE and autoradiography. Mainly a Thr residue(s) was observed to be phosphorylated; no spot corresponding to pSer or pTyr was observed. (D) Diagrammatic representation of residues of MtbEf-Tuphos phosphorylated by PknB during coexpression in E. coli. A probable domain-wise distribution of phosphorylation sites is shown.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Interaction of MtbEf-Tu with BODIPY FL-GTP. (A) The interactions of MtbEf-Tuphos and MtbEf-Tuunphos (2 μM each) with the fluorophore BODIPY FL-GTP (10 nM) were studied by recording the emission spectrum from 490 nm to 600 nm after excitation at 488 nm. A buffer containing BODIPY FL-GTP served as a control. (B) Spectrum recorded from 490 to 600 nm by adding increasing concentrations of MtbEf-Tuunphos (1 to 10 μM) to a buffer containing BODIPY FL-GTP (10 nM). (C) Saturation curve for the MtbEf-Tuunphos–BODIPY FL-GTP interaction. (D) Spectrum recorded from 490 to 600 nm by adding increasing concentrations of MtbEf-Tuphos (1 to 10 μM) to a buffer containing BODIPY FL-GTP (10 nM). (E) Saturation curve for the MtbEf-Tuphos–BODIPY FL-GTP interaction.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Phosphorylation and interaction of MtbEf-TuT118A with BODIPY FL-GTP. (A) Bar graph showing partial loss of the phosphorylation signal on the MtbEf-TuT118A mutant compared to the native protein when phosphorylated by PknBc. (B and C) Interaction of increasing concentrations of MtbEf-Tu (B) or MtbEf-TuT118A (C) (1 μM to 4 μM) with a constant concentration of BODIPY FL-GTP (200 nM).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Dissociation of BODIPY FL-GDP from MtbEf-Tu and effect of Ef-Ts. Spontaneous dissociation of BODIPY FL-GDP from MtbEf-Tu (1 μM) was measured by titrating the MtbEf-Tu–BODIPY FL-GDP complex with an excess of unlabeled GDP (500 nM) at 25°C. BODIPY FL-GDP was excited at 488 nm, and emission was measured at 512 nm. (A) The dissociation of BODIPY FL-GDP from MtbEf-Tuphos (curve 2), MtbEf-Tuunphos (curve 3), and buffer F, used as a control (curve 1), was measured up to 800 s. (B) The dissociation of BODIPY FL-GDP from MtbEf-Tuphos (curve 2) and MtbEf-Tuunphos (curve 3) was measured in the presence of Ef-Ts (200 nM).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Effect of kirromycin on the interaction of MtbEf-Tu with GTP. The interactions of MtbEf-Tuunphos (1 μM) (A) and MtbEf-Tuphos (1 μM) (B) with BODIPY FL-GTP (10 nM) were studied in the presence of kirromycin (10 μM) by recording the emission spectrum from 500 to 600 nm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abel K., Jurnak F. 1996. A complex profile of protein elongation: translating chemical energy into molecular movement. Structure 4:229–238 - PubMed
    1. Agirrezabala X., Frank J. 2009. Elongation in translation as a dynamic interaction among the ribosome, tRNA, and elongation factors EF-G and EF-Tu. Q. Rev. Biophys. 42:159–200 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander C., et al. 1995. Phosphorylation of elongation factor Tu prevents ternary complex formation. J. Biol. Chem. 270:14541–14547 - PubMed
    1. Ames G. F., Niakido K. 1979. In vivo methylation of prokaryotic elongation factor Tu. J. Biol. Chem. 254:9947–9950 - PubMed
    1. Arai K., et al. 1980. Primary structure of elongation factor Tu from Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77:1326–1330 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources