Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;58(2):238-257.
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00383.x.

Internet-Based Interactive Support for Cancer Patients: Are Integrated Systems Better?

Affiliations

Internet-Based Interactive Support for Cancer Patients: Are Integrated Systems Better?

David H Gustafson et al. J Commun. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

To compare the benefits of the Internet generally versus a focused system of services, 257 breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to a control group, access to the Internet with links to high-quality breast cancer sites, or access to an eHealth system (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System, CHESS) that integrated information, support, and decision and analysis tools. The intervention lasted 5 months, and self-report data on quality of life, health-care competence, and social support were collected at pretest and at 2-, 4-, and 9-month posttests. CHESS subjects logged on more overall than Internet subjects and accessed more health resources, but the latter used non health-related sites more. Subjects with access to the Internet alone experienced no better outcomes than controls at any of the 3 time points, compared to pretest levels. Subjects with CHESS experienced greater social support during the intervention period and had higher scores on all 3 outcomes at 9 months, 4 months after the intervention ended. CHESS subjects also scored higher than those with Internet access during the intervention period but not significantly after the intervention ended. Thus, CHESS (with one simple interface and integrated information, communication, and skills services) helped newly diagnosed breast cancer patients even after computers were removed. In contrast, patients received little benefit from Internet access, despite having links to a variety of high-quality sites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average number of logins per participant.

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2007. Altanta, GA: Author; 2007. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2007PWSecured.pdf.
    1. Bader J, Strickman-Stein N. Evaluation of new multimedia formats for cancer communications. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2003;5:e16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baur C. Limiting factors in the transformative powers of e-mail in patient-physician relationships. Health Communication. 2000;12(3):239–259. - PubMed
    1. Bernhardt JM, Larscy RAW, Parrott RL, Silk KJ, Felter EM. Perceived barriers to Internet-based health communication on human genetics. Journal of Health Communication. 2002;7:325–340. - PubMed
    1. Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1997;15(3):974–986. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources