Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1990 Mar;60(3):163-71.
doi: 10.1007/BF01720270.

Treatment strategies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). B. Second line treatment

Affiliations
Review

Treatment strategies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). B. Second line treatment

W Hiddemann et al. Blut. 1990 Mar.

Abstract

The strategy for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia must primarily be based on the patient's age and clinical condition as well as on the stage of the disease. Accordingly, the general decision between an intensive approach including high-dose chemotherapy or possibly immediate allogeneic bone marrow transplantation versus less-aggressive palliative treatment will precede the selection of the most appropriate salvage regimen. In patients qualifying for intensive second-line chemotherapy the duration of the first remission and the number of relapses provide the means to discriminate between refractoriness or maintained responsiveness to conventional protocols. More than 50% of patients with first relapses after 6-12 months remission duration will respond to standard therapy again and should therefore not be entered on investigational agents with unproven antileukemic activity. The latter seems deeply warranted, on the other hand, for early relapses, second recurrences and resistant first relapses with a remission rate of less than 30% after conventional regimens. These guidelines not only provide an objective rationale for selecting the most appropriate strategy at relapse in individual patients. Furthermore, they facilitate interstudy comparisons and a better judgement of different treatment protocols.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Oncol. 1987 Sep;5(9):1445-51 - PubMed
    1. Leukemia. 1988 Feb;2(2):79-83 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1979;3(2):71-80 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985 Sep;69(9):1001-2 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1982 Dec 11;2(8311):1345-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources