Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):407-16.
doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.83204.

Impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services: a systematic review of the literature

Abdullah Alkhenizan  1 , Charles Shaw
Affiliations

Impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services: a systematic review of the literature

Abdullah Alkhenizan et al. Ann Saudi Med. 2011 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background and objective: Accreditation is usually a voluntary program in which trained external peer reviewers evaluate a healthcare organization's compliance and compare it with pre-established performance standards. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of accreditation programs on the quality of healthcare services

Methods: We did a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the impact of accreditation programs on the quality of healthcare services. Several databases were systematically searched, including Medline, Embase, Healthstar, and Cinhal.

Results: Twenty-six studies evaluating the impact of accreditation were identified. The majority of the studies showed general accreditation for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), trauma, ambulatory surgical care, infection control and pain management; and subspecialty accreditation programs to significantly improve the process of care provided by healthcare services by improving the structure and organization of healthcare facilities. Several studies showed that general accreditation programs significantly improve clinical outcomes and the quality of care of these clinical conditions and showed a significant positive impact of subspecialty accreditation programs in improving clinical outcomes in different subspecialties, including sleep medicine, chest pain management and trauma management.

Conclusions: There is consistent evidence that shows that accreditation programs improve the process of care provided by healthcare services. There is considerable evidence to show that accreditation programs improve clinical outcomes of a wide spectrum of clinical conditions. Accreditation programs should be supported as a tool to improve the quality of healthcare services.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Shaw CD. Toolkit for Accreditation Programs.The International Society for Quality In Health Care. Australia: 2004.
    1. Montagu D. London: Department for international development health systems resource centre; [Last accessed on 2003]. Accreditation and other external quality assessment systems for healthcare: Review of experience and lessons learned. Available from: http://www.dfidhealthrc.org/publications/health_service_delivery/Accredi... .
    1. Shaw CD. External quality mechanisms for health care: Summary of the ExPeRT project on visitatie, accreditation, EFQM and ISO assessment in European Union countries. External peer review techniques. European foundation for quality management. International organization for standardization. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12:169–75. - PubMed
    1. Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Health sector accreditation research: A systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20:172–83. - PubMed
    1. Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, Lohr KN, Mulrow CD, Teutsch SM, et al. Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the process. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:21–35. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms