The inverted pyramid of biomarker-driven trials
- PMID: 21808269
- DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.113
The inverted pyramid of biomarker-driven trials
Abstract
In the past, clinical phase I trials often suffered from low response rates and inadequate experimental drug doses. Over the past decade, however, phase I trials have evolved from simple dose-finding studies to trials that might provide clinically relevant therapeutic opportunities for patients with advanced-stage cancer for which no standard therapies are available. In the future, the routine use of modern technologies such as large-scale genome sequencing will help to unravel the specific biology of a patient's cancer. Such tools will expand our knowledge about genetic aberrations and might provide opportunities for the development of novel, molecular targeted therapies for patients with refractory cancer. Increasingly, the focus will likely turn from carrying out large randomized trials in unselected patients to conducting smaller biomarker-driven trials in selected patients with known molecular aberrations. We expect that these new strategies will enhance response rates as appropriate patients are targeted, therefore sparing those patients who are unlikely to benefit.
Similar articles
-
Recent innovations in the USA National Cancer Institute-sponsored investigator initiated Phase I and II anticancer drug development.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov;45(11):1001-6. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv144. Epub 2015 Sep 29. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26423340 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomarker-Driven Treatments Yield Better Results.Cancer Discov. 2016 Aug;6(8):OF4. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2016-083. Epub 2016 Jun 29. Cancer Discov. 2016. PMID: 27357459
-
Phase III trials of targeted anticancer therapies: redesigning the concept.Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Sep 15;19(18):4931-40. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1222. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Clin Cancer Res. 2013. PMID: 23881926 Review.
-
What have we learned from exceptional tumour responses?: Review and perspectives.Curr Opin Oncol. 2015 May;27(3):267-75. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000182. Curr Opin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25811347 Review.
-
Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1324-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00188-6. Epub 2015 Sep 3. Lancet Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26342236 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Revisiting clinical trials using EGFR inhibitor-based regimens in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of an MD Anderson Cancer Center phase I population.Oncotarget. 2013 May;4(5):772-84. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1028. Oncotarget. 2013. PMID: 23800712 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Aberrations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in 958 patients with diverse advanced tumors: implications for therapy.Ann Oncol. 2013 Mar;24(3):838-42. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds524. Epub 2012 Nov 8. Ann Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23139256 Free PMC article.
-
Testing for oncogenic molecular aberrations in cell-free DNA-based liquid biopsies in the clinic: are we there yet?Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2015;15(12):1631-44. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2015.1110021. Epub 2015 Nov 11. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2015. PMID: 26559503 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Feedback activation of AMPK-mediated autophagy acceleration is a key resistance mechanism against SCD1 inhibitor-induced cell growth inhibition.PLoS One. 2017 Jul 13;12(7):e0181243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181243. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28704514 Free PMC article.
-
The Growth Modulation Index (GMI) as an Efficacy Outcome in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review with Suggested Reporting Guidelines.Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 May;27(5):516-532. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01667-1. Epub 2025 Mar 29. Curr Oncol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40156702 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous