Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;2(4):254-7.
doi: 10.4103/0974-8490.69127.

Antimicrobial screening of ethnobotanically important stem bark of medicinal plants

Meenakshi Singh  1 , Sayyada Khatoon, Shweta Singh, Vivek Kumar, Ajay Kumar Singh Rawat, Shanta Mehrotra
Affiliations

Antimicrobial screening of ethnobotanically important stem bark of medicinal plants

Meenakshi Singh et al. Pharmacognosy Res. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The stem barks are the rich sources of tannins and other phenolic compounds. Tannins inhibited the growth of various fungi, yeast, bacteria and virus. Hence, ten stem barks of ethnomedicinally important plants were screened for antibacterial and antifungal activities against human pathogenic strains.

Methods: Air-dried and powdered stem bark of each plant was extracted with 50% aqueous ethanol, lyophilized and the dried crude extracts were used for the screening against 11 bacteria and 8 fungi. Antibacterial and antifungal activities were performed according to microdilution methods by NCCLS.

Results: The plants Prosopis chilensis, Pithecellobium dulce, Mangifera indica showed significant antibacterial and antifungal activities against Streptococcus pneumonia, Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella pneumonia and Candida albicans with MIC of 0.08mg/ml. Pithecellobium dulce bark also showed significant antibacterial activity against Bacillus cereus.

Conclusion: The bark of Pithecellobium dulce has more or less similar activity against the known antibiotic and may be considered as potent antimicrobial agent for various infectious diseases.

Keywords: Antibacterial; MIC; antifungal; bark; ethnobotany.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mokaddas E, Rotimi VO, Sanyal SC. In vitro activity of Piperacillin/tazobactom versus other broad antibiotics against nosocomial Gram negative pathogens isolated from burn patients. J Chemother. 1998;19:208–14. - PubMed
    1. Dhar LM, Dhar MM, Dhawan BN, Mehrotra BN, Ray C. Screening of Indian plants for biological activity. Part I. Indian J Exp Biol. 1968;6:232–47. - PubMed
    1. Perumal Samy R, Ignacimuthu S. Antibacterial activity of some folklore medicinal plants used by tribals in Western Ghats of India. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;69:63–71. - PubMed
    1. Dahanukar SA, Kulkarni RA, Rege NN. Pharmacology of medicinal plants and natural products. Indian J Pharmacol. 2000;32:81–118.
    1. Evans WC. English Language Book Society/ Bailliere Tindall. 13th ed. Oxford: Great Britain by the Alden Press; 1989. Trease and Evans, Pharmacognosy; pp. 544–53.

LinkOut - more resources