Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct 10;1(2):e26.
doi: 10.4081/or.2009.e26.

The relevance of ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: how important is it? A systematic review of the literature

Affiliations

The relevance of ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: how important is it? A systematic review of the literature

Sina Babazadeh et al. Orthop Rev (Pavia). .

Abstract

Ligament balancing affects many of the postoperative criteria for a successful knee replacement. A balanced knee contributes to improved alignment and stability. Ligament balancing helps reduce wear and loosening of the joint. A patient with a balanced knee is more likely to have increased range of motion and proprioception, and decreased pain. All these factors help minimize the need for revision surgery. Complications associated with ligament balancing can include instability caused by over-balancing and the possibility of neurovascular damage during or as a result of ligament balancing. This article attempts to summarize the literature, to define a balanced knee, and outline the benefits and possible complications of ligament balancing. Different techniques, sequences, and tools used in ligament balancing, and their relevance in correcting various deformities are reviewed.

Keywords: arthroplasty.; knee; ligament balancing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interests: the authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Common peroneal nerve.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Mechanical alignment, (B) anatomical alignment, (C) tibiofemoral angle, and (D, E) bony cuts.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Balanced resection using tensor balancer device.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Severely valgus knee.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Posterior capsule.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Varus knee.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(A) Whiteside's line, (B) epicondylar axis, (C) posterior condylar axis, and (D) tibial bony cut, perpendicular to tibial long axis.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Computer-assisted surgery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AOA. [[cited 2009 17/02/2009]];AOA national joint replacement registry. 2009 http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/index.jsp.
    1. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, et al. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1487–97. - PubMed
    1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–5. - PubMed
    1. Sheng PY, Konttinen L, Lehto M, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 through 2002. A review of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1425–30. - PubMed
    1. Bozic KJ, Durbhakula S, Berry DJ, et al. Differences in patient and procedure characteristics and hospital resource use in primary and revision total joint arthroplasty: a multicenter study. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:S17–25. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources