Primary total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the lateral Hardinge approach to an anterior mini-invasive approach
- PMID: 21808689
- PMCID: PMC3143982
- DOI: 10.4081/or.2009.e27
Primary total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the lateral Hardinge approach to an anterior mini-invasive approach
Abstract
The anterior mini-invasive (MI) approach to performing total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with less soft tissue damage and shorter postoperative recovery than other methods. Our hospital recently abandoned the traditional lateral Hardinge (LH) approach in favour of this new method. We compared the first 100 patients operated after the changeover to the new method (MI group) to the last 100 patients operated using the traditional method (LH group). Clinical and radiological parameters and complications were recorded pre- and postoperatively and the collected data of the two groups were statistically compared. There were no statistically significant differences between either group with regard to patient demographics or procedural data, placement of the femur component, postoperative leg discrepancy, prosthesis dislocation, blood transfusion, or postoperative dislocation of the components. The MI group had a significantly longer operating time, more bleeding, higher rate of nerve damage, and a higher percentage of acetabular component malposition whilst having a significantly shorter hospital stay and significantly fewer infections of the operative site in comparison to the LH group. Additionally, and perhaps most worrying was the clinically significant increase in intraoperative femur fractures in the MI group. The changeover to the anterior mini-invasive approach, which was the surgeons' initial experience with the MI technique, resulted in a drastic increase in the number of overall complications accompanied by less soft tissue damage and a shorter period of rehabilitation. Our results suggest that further analysis of this surgical MI technique will be needed before it can be recommended for widespread adoption.
Keywords: Hardinge; anterior approach; hip surgery; joint surgery; mini-invasive surgery; orthopedics; total hip arthroplasty..
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interests: the authors report no conflicts of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Influence of surgical experience in the learning curve of a new approach in hip replacement: anterior mini-invasive vs. standard lateral.Hip Int. 2012 Sep-Oct;22(5):555-61. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9710. Hip Int. 2012. PMID: 23023648
-
Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jul;86(7):1353-8. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200407000-00001. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004. PMID: 15252080
-
Mini-incision direct lateral approach versus anterior mini-invasive approach in total hip replacement: results 1 year after surgery.Acta Biomed. 2012 Aug;83(2):114-21. Acta Biomed. 2012. PMID: 23393919
-
Minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty.Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-7. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007. PMID: 17605194 Review. English, Polish.
-
Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials.Int Orthop. 2019 Jul;43(7):1573-1582. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4124-3. Epub 2018 Aug 31. Int Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30171273 Review.
Cited by
-
The ABLE Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach: A Safe and Effective Option for Total Hip Arthroplasty.Arthroplast Today. 2022 Jul 19;16:264-269.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.007. eCollection 2022 Aug. Arthroplast Today. 2022. PMID: 36092135 Free PMC article.
-
Direct anterior versus direct lateral hip approach in total hip arthroplasty with the same perioperative protocols one year post fellowship training.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 19;18(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03716-6. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 36935481 Free PMC article.
-
Orthostatic retractor placement reduces operating time and post-operative inflammatory response during the learning curve of anterior approach THA.J Orthop. 2020 Oct 18;22:503-512. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.10.011. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec. J Orthop. 2020. PMID: 33132623 Free PMC article.
-
[Minimally invasive anterior approach].Orthopade. 2012 May;41(5):390-8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1894-3. Orthopade. 2012. PMID: 22581149 Review. German.
-
Do Postoperative Results Differ in a Randomized Trial Between a Direct Anterior and a Direct Lateral Approach in THA?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jan;477(1):145-155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000439. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 30179928 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- McFarland B, Osborne G. Approach to the hip: a suggested improvement on Kocher's method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1954;36-B:364–7.
-
- Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64B:17–9. - PubMed
-
- Furnes O, Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Steindal K, Sørås TE. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register Report 2008. Bergen, Norway: 2008.
-
- Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:46–53. - PubMed
-
- Kennon R, Keggi J, Zatorski LE, Keggi KJ. Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: beyond the minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(2):91–7. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources