Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;20(3):250-67.
doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0185-9.

"Here's my dilemma". Moral case deliberation as a platform for discussing everyday ethics in elderly care

Affiliations

"Here's my dilemma". Moral case deliberation as a platform for discussing everyday ethics in elderly care

S van der Dam et al. Health Care Anal. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Our study presents an overview of the issues that were brought forward by participants of a moral case deliberation (MCD) project in two elderly care organizations. The overview was inductively derived from all case descriptions (N = 202) provided by participants of seven mixed MCD groups, consisting of care providers from various professional backgrounds, from nursing assistant to physician. The MCD groups were part of a larger MCD project within two care institutions (residential homes and nursing homes). Care providers are confronted with a wide variety of largely everyday ethical issues. We distinguished three main categories: 'resident's behavior', 'divergent perspectives on good care' and 'organizational context'. The overview can be used for agendasetting when institutions wish to stimulate reflection and deliberation. It is important that an agenda is constructed from the bottom-up and open to a variety of issues. In addition, organizing reflection and deliberation requires effort to identify moral questions in practice whilst at the same time maintaining the connection with the organizational context and existing communication structures. Once care providers are used to dealing with divergent perspectives, inviting different perspectives (e.g. family members) to take part in the deliberation, might help to identify and address ethical 'blind spots'.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Source case description
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Themes and subthemes

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abma, T. A. (2010). Herinneringen en dromen van zeggenschap. Cliëntenparticipatie in deouderenzorg [Memories and dreams of agency. Client participation in elderly care]. Inaugural lecture. Boom/Lemma: Den Haag.
    1. Abma TA, Molewijk AC, Widdershoven GAM. Good care in ongoing dialogue. Improving the quality of care through moral deliberation and responsive evaluation. Health Care Analysis. 2009;17:217–235. doi: 10.1007/s10728-008-0102-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abma, T. A., Bruijn, A., Kardol, T., Schols, J., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2011). Responsibilities in elderly care. The narrative of Mr Powell. Bioethics (accepted, October 2010). - PubMed
    1. Bolmsjö IÅ, Edberg AK, Sandman L. Everyday Ethical problems in dementia care: A teleological model. Nursing Ethics. 2006;13:340–359. doi: 10.1191/0969733006ne890oa. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bolmsjö IÅ, Sandman L, Andersson E. Everyday ethics in the care of elderly people. Nursing Ethics. 2006;13:249–263. doi: 10.1191/0969733006ne875oa. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types