Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jan;470(1):99-107.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1996-6.

Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA

Vincent Y Ng  1 , Jeffrey H DeClaire, Keith R Berend, Bethany C Gulick, Adolph V Lombardi Jr
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA

Vincent Y Ng et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Coronal malalignment occurs frequently in TKA and may affect implant durability and knee function. Designed to improve alignment accuracy and precision, the patient-specific positioning guide is predicated on restoration of the overall mechanical axis and is a multifaceted new tool in achieving traditional goals of TKA.

Questions/purposes: We compared the effectiveness of patient-specific positioning guides to manual instrumentation with intramedullary femoral and extramedullary tibial guides in restoring the mechanical axis of the extremity and achieving neutral coronal alignment of the femoral and tibial components.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 569 TKAs performed with patient-specific positioning guides and 155 with manual instrumentation by two surgeons using postoperative long-leg radiographs. For all patients, we assessed the zone in which the overall mechanical axis passed through the knee, and for one surgeon's cases (105 patient-specific positioning guide, 55 manual instrumentation), we also measured the hip-knee-ankle angle and the individual component angles with respect to their mechanical axes.

Results: The overall mechanical axis passed through the central third of the knee more often with patient-specific positioning guides (88%) than with manual instrumentation (78%). The overall mean hip-knee-ankle angle for patient-specific positioning guides (180.6°) was similar to manual instrumentation (181.1°), but there were fewer ± 3° hip-knee-ankle angle outliers with patient-specific positioning guides (9%) than with manual instrumentation (22%). The overall mean tibial (89.9° versus 90.4°) and femoral (90.7° versus 91.3°) component angles were closer to neutral with patient-specific positioning guides than with manual instrumentation, but the rate of ± 2° outliers was similar for both the tibia (10% versus 7%) and femur (22% versus 18%).

Conclusions: Patient-specific positioning guides can assist in achieving a neutral mechanical axis with reduction in outliers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1 A–B
Fig. 1 A–B
The photograph displays the PSPG and its use intraoperatively to facilitate accurate pin placement on the (A) femur and (B) tibia for standard cutting blocks.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The graph demonstrates the range of deviation from neutral alignment for the HKA angle for the PSPG and MI systems.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.05.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartel DL, Burstein AH, Santavicca EA, Insall JN. Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1026–1033. - PubMed
    1. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Grifka J. CT-free computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: radiographic results of 100 cases. Orthopedics. 2004;27:476–480. - PubMed
    1. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:682–687. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B5.14927. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26–34. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000148578.22729.0e. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms