Statistical considerations for the next generation of clinical trials
- PMID: 21810519
- DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.05.014
Statistical considerations for the next generation of clinical trials
Abstract
In this article, we address some of the statistical issues associated with the next generation of oncology clinical trials. Specifically, we focus on two critical aspects of oncologic clinical trials: study endpoints and study design. In our discussion of study endpoints, we provide an overview of endpoints relevant to each phase of clinical trials (phases I, II, and III) and discuss some of the trends in selecting endpoints in recent years. For phase I designs, the traditional assumption that increasing dose will always lead to increasing efficacy, appropriate for cytotoxic agents, is not applicable to novel therapeutics such as in colorectal carcinoma. We emphasize the role of surrogate endpoints in modern clinical trials. In our discussion of study design, we are particularly interested in the essential role of randomization, and discuss recently developed randomized phase II designs. We consider the role biomarkers play in the design of clinical trials and introduce study designs for biomarker evaluations. Finally, we briefly discuss the application of adaptive designs in clinical trials.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Adaptive methods: telling "the rest of the story".J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Nov;20(6):1150-65. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2010.514457. J Biopharm Stat. 2010. PMID: 21058111
-
An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints.Pharm Stat. 2011 Jul-Aug;10(4):347-56. doi: 10.1002/pst.472. Epub 2010 Dec 8. Pharm Stat. 2011. PMID: 22328327
-
Clinical trial designs for multiple myeloma.Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2007 Apr;5(4):309-16. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17607290 Review.
-
Analysis strategies for adaptive designs with multiple endpoints.J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(6):1189-200. doi: 10.1080/10543400701645348. J Biopharm Stat. 2007. PMID: 18027225
-
The use of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: focus on clinical trials in cardiovascular diseases.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Oct-Nov;10(6):497-508. doi: 10.1002/pds.654. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001. PMID: 11828831 Review.
Cited by
-
Multi-level evidence that circulating CK18 is a biomarker of tumour burden in colorectal cancer.Br J Cancer. 2012 Oct 23;107(9):1518-24. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.416. Epub 2012 Sep 20. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22996610 Free PMC article.
-
Commentary on Hey and Kimmelman.Clin Trials. 2015 Apr;12(2):110-2. doi: 10.1177/1740774514568875. Epub 2015 Feb 3. Clin Trials. 2015. PMID: 25649110 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Biomarker-Guided Non-Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review.J Pers Med. 2017 Jan 25;7(1):1. doi: 10.3390/jpm7010001. J Pers Med. 2017. PMID: 28125057 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomarker-Guided Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review.PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149803. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26910238 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical