Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Aug 16;124(7):789-95.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.010710. Epub 2011 Aug 1.

Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis

Jacob Sattelmair  1 , Jeremy Pertman, Eric L Ding, Harold W Kohl 3rd, William Haskell, I-Min Lee
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis

Jacob Sattelmair et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: No reviews have quantified the specific amounts of physical activity required for lower risks of coronary heart disease when assessing the dose-response relation. Instead, previous reviews have used qualitative estimates such as low, moderate, and high physical activity.

Methods and results: We performed an aggregate data meta-analysis of epidemiological studies investigating physical activity and primary prevention of CHD. We included prospective cohort studies published in English since 1995. After reviewing 3194 abstracts, we included 33 studies. We used random-effects generalized least squares spline models for trend estimation to derive pooled dose-response estimates. Among the 33 studies, 9 allowed quantitative estimates of leisure-time physical activity. Individuals who engaged in the equivalent of 150 min/wk of moderate-intensity leisure-time physical activity (minimum amount, 2008 U.S. federal guidelines) had a 14% lower coronary heart disease risk (relative risk, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.96) compared with those reporting no leisure-time physical activity. Those engaging in the equivalent of 300 min/wk of moderate-intensity leisure-time physical activity (2008 U.S. federal guidelines for additional benefits) had a 20% (relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.88) lower risk. At higher levels of physical activity, relative risks were modestly lower. People who were physically active at levels lower than the minimum recommended amount also had significantly lower risk of coronary heart disease. There was a significant interaction by sex (P=0.03); the association was stronger among women than men.

Conclusions: These findings provide quantitative data supporting US physical activity guidelines that stipulate that "some physical activity is better than none" and "additional benefits occur with more physical activity."

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures:

Jacob Sattelmair is an employee at Dossia.

Jeremy Pertman has no potential conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.

Eric Ding is supported by a fellowship from the American Diabetes Association.

Bill Kohl has no potential conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.

Bill Haskell has no potential conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.

I-Min Lee has received investigator-initiated research funding from the National Institutes of Health; she serves as a consultant to Virgin HealthMiles and sits on their Scientific Advisory Board.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plot of Relative Risks of CHD by Category* of LTPA *All study categories were standardized to five categories for ease of comparison. The size of the data point corresponds to the study size; the larger the dot, the larger the sample size.
Dashed linesStudies with physical activity categorized quantitatively
Solid linesStudies with physical activity categorized categorically
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plot with Spline (Smoothed Fit), and 95% Confidence Intervals of Relative Risks of CHD by Kcal/wk of LTPA [Table: see text]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Generalized Least Squares (GLST) Regression Spline (Smoothed Fit) Models with 95% Confidence Intervals [Table: see text]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Generalized Least Squares (GLST) Regression Spline (Smoothed Fit) Models with 95% Confidence Intervals [Table: see text]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Ford E, Furie K, Gillespie C, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern S, Ho PM, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lackland D, Lisabeth L, Marelli A, McDermott M, Meigs J, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino M, Nichol G, Roger VL, Rosamond W, Sacco R, Sorlie P, Stafford R, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wong ND, Wylie-Rosett J. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2010 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:e46–e215. - PubMed
    1. Berlin JA, Colditz GA. A meta-analysis of physical activity in the prevention of coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:612–628. - PubMed
    1. Eaton CB. Relation of physical activity and cardiovascular fitness to coronary heart disease, Part I: A meta-analysis of the independent relation of physical activity and coronary heart disease. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1992;5:31–42. - PubMed
    1. Pate RP, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, Buchner D, Ettinger W, Heath GW, King AC, Kriska A, Leon AS, Marcus BH, Morris J, Paffenbarger RS, Jr, Patrick K, Pollock ML, Rippe JM, Sallis J, Wilmore JH. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995;273:402–407. - PubMed
    1. Williams PT. Physical fitness and activity as separate heart disease risk factors: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:754–761. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types