In vivo liver tissue mechanical properties by Transient Elastography: comparison with Dynamic Mechanical Analysis
- PMID: 21811013
- DOI: 10.3233/BIR-2011-0584
In vivo liver tissue mechanical properties by Transient Elastography: comparison with Dynamic Mechanical Analysis
Abstract
Understanding the mechanical properties of human liver is one of the most critical aspects of its numerical modeling for medical applications or impact biomechanics. Generally, model constitutive laws come from in vitro data. However, the elastic properties of liver may change significantly after death and with time. Furthermore, in vitro liver elastic properties reported in the literature have often not been compared quantitatively with in vivo liver mechanical properties on the same organ. In this study, both steps are investigated on porcine liver. The elastic property of the porcine liver, given by the shear modulus G, was measured by both Transient Elastography (TE) and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA). Shear modulus measurements were realized on in vivo and in vitro liver to compare the TE and DMA methods and to study the influence of testing conditions on the liver viscoelastic properties. In vitro results show that elastic properties obtained by TE and DMA are in agreement. Liver tissue in the frequency range from 0.1 to 4 Hz can be modeled by a two-mode relaxation model. Furthermore, results show that the liver is homogeneous, isotropic and more elastic than viscous. Finally, it is shown in this study that viscoelastic properties obtained by TE and DMA change significantly with post mortem time and with the boundary conditions.
© 2011 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved
Similar articles
-
Viscoelastic properties of liver measured by oscillatory rheometry and multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography.Biorheology. 2010;47(2):133-41. doi: 10.3233/BIR-2010-0565. Biorheology. 2010. PMID: 20683156
-
Assessment of in vivo and post-mortem mechanical behavior of brain tissue using magnetic resonance elastography.J Biomech. 2008 Oct 20;41(14):2954-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.034. Epub 2008 Sep 20. J Biomech. 2008. PMID: 18805534
-
Wide-range dynamic magnetic resonance elastography.J Biomech. 2011 Apr 29;44(7):1380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.12.031. Epub 2011 Feb 3. J Biomech. 2011. PMID: 21295305
-
[Magnetic resonance elastography 2.0: high resolution imaging of soft tissue elasticity, viscosity and pressure].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013 Nov;138(47):2426-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343318. Epub 2013 Jul 9. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013. PMID: 23839480 Review. German.
-
Why Are Viscosity and Nonlinearity Bound to Make an Impact in Clinical Elastographic Diagnosis?Sensors (Basel). 2020 Apr 22;20(8):2379. doi: 10.3390/s20082379. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32331295 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Using torsional wave elastography to evaluate spring pot parameters in skin tumor mimicking phantoms.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 11;14(1):16058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66621-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38992074 Free PMC article.
-
Viscoelastic biomarker for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesion in ultra- low frequency range.Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 5;9(1):5737. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41885-9. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 30952880 Free PMC article.
-
Towards constructing a generalized structural 3D breathing human lung model based on experimental volumes, pressures, and strains.PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jan 13;21(1):e1012680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012680. eCollection 2025 Jan. PLoS Comput Biol. 2025. PMID: 39804822 Free PMC article.
-
Characterizing the compression-dependent viscoelastic properties of human hepatic pathologies using dynamic compression testing.Phys Med Biol. 2012 Apr 21;57(8):2273-86. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/8/2273. Epub 2012 Mar 30. Phys Med Biol. 2012. PMID: 22459948 Free PMC article.
-
Viscoelasticity, Like Forces, Plays a Role in Mechanotransduction.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Feb 9;10:789841. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.789841. eCollection 2022. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022. PMID: 35223831 Free PMC article. Review.