Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;19(11):1114-21.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.109. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

Impact of gene patents on diagnostic testing: a new patent landscaping method applied to spinocerebellar ataxia

Affiliations

Impact of gene patents on diagnostic testing: a new patent landscaping method applied to spinocerebellar ataxia

Nele Berthels et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Recent reports in Europe and the United States raise concern about the potential negative impact of gene patents on the freedom to operate of diagnosticians and on the access of patients to genetic diagnostic services. Patents, historically seen as legal instruments to trigger innovation, could cause undesired side effects in the public health domain. Clear empirical evidence on the alleged hindering effect of gene patents is still scarce. We therefore developed a patent categorization method to determine which gene patents could indeed be problematic. The method is applied to patents relevant for genetic testing of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). The SCA test is probably the most widely used DNA test in (adult) neurology, as well as one of the most challenging due to the heterogeneity of the disease. Typically tested as a gene panel covering the five common SCA subtypes, we show that the patenting of SCA genes and testing methods and the associated licensing conditions could have far-reaching consequences on legitimate access to this gene panel. Moreover, with genetic testing being increasingly standardized, simply ignoring patents is unlikely to hold out indefinitely. This paper aims to differentiate among so-called 'gene patents' by lifting out the truly problematic ones. In doing so, awareness is raised among all stakeholders in the genetic diagnostics field who are not necessarily familiar with the ins and outs of patenting and licensing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The patent categorization method for the assessment of hampering effects of patents related to genetic diagnostics. The metaphors of step 5 are modified from http://GenericsWeb.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Legal status and relative numbers of patent documents within the SCA patent families, considering one United States patent per patent family. ‘Patent application dead' means that the application is no longer under examination (abandoned, refused, withdrawn or deemed to be withdrawn). ‘Patent pending' is a patent application that is currently being examined. ‘Patent dead' means that a granted patent has either lapsed or been nullified. ‘Patent alive' is a granted patent that is currently valid.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The SCA patent landscape considering granted and pending patents in Europe and in the United States (One Unites States patent is considered per patent family).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cook-Deegan R, Chandrasekharan S, Angrist M.The dangers of diagnostic monopolies Nature 2009458405–406.Also see the case studies carried out by Cook-Deegan and his team: Patently Complicated: Case studies on the impact of patenting and licensing on clinical access to genetic testing in the United States. Genet Med 201012(4 suppl S1–S211. - PubMed
    1. Gaisser S, Hopkins MM, Liddell K, Zika E, Ibarreta D. The phantom menace of gene patents. Nature. 2009;458:407–408. - PubMed
    1. Kaye J, Hawkins N, Taylor J. Patents and translational research in genomics. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:739–741. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klein RD. Gene patents and genetic testing in the United States. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:989–990. - PubMed
    1. Cho MK, Illangasekare S, Weaver MA, Leonard DG, Merz JF. Effects of patents and licenses on the provision of clinical genetic testing services. J Mol Diagn. 2003;5:3–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types