Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;108(28-29):495-505; quiz 506.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0495. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Hormonal contraception--what kind, when, and for whom?

Affiliations

Hormonal contraception--what kind, when, and for whom?

Inka Wiegratz et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Background: In Germany today, one-third of the 20 million women of child-bearing age use combined oral contraceptives (COCs). In this article, we summarize the current knowledge of the mode of action, wanted and unwanted side effects, and long-term risks of COCs. The levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD) and long-acting injectable or implantable monophasic progestogen preparations offer comparable contraceptive efficacy to COCs. Nonetheless, they are less frequently used in Germany than COCs, because of their propensity to cause breakthrough bleeding.

Method: Selective review of the literature.

Results: COCs suppress gonadotropin secretion and thereby inhibit follicular maturation and ovulation. Their correct use is associated with 0.3 pregnancies per 100 women per year, their typical use, with 1 pregnancy per 100 women per year (Pearl index). COCs have effects on the cardiovascular and hemostatic systems as well as on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. When given in the presence of specific risk factors, they significantly increase the likelihood of cardiovascular disease and thromboembolism. Women with persistent human papilloma virus (HPV) infection who take COCs are at increased risk of developing invasive cervical cancer. On the other hand, COCs lower the cumulative incidence of endometrial and ovarian cancer by 30% to 50%, and that of colorectal cancer by 20% to 30%. Other malignancies seem to be unaffected by COC use.

Conclusion: As long as personal and familial risk factors are carefully considered, COCs constitute a safe, reversible, and well-tolerated method of contraception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Homonal contraception regimens (e4)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Measures to manage mistakes in pill taking with monophasic COCs (modified from [6]).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/97892... 4th. Geneva: WHO; 2009. Medical elegibility criteria for contraceptive use.
    1. Kuhl H. Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration. Climacteric. 2005;8(Suppl 1):3–63. - PubMed
    1. Dinger J, Minh TD, Buttmann N, Bardenheuer K. Effectiveness of oral contraceptive pills in a large US. cohort comparing progestogen and regimen. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:33–40. - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg M, Waugh MS. Causes and consequences of oral contraceptive noncompliance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:276–279. - PubMed
    1. Mansour D, Inki P, Gemzell-Danielson K. Efficacy of contraceptive methods: a review of the literature. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010;15:4–16. - PubMed

MeSH terms