Hormonal contraception--what kind, when, and for whom?
- PMID: 21814535
- PMCID: PMC3149298
- DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0495
Hormonal contraception--what kind, when, and for whom?
Abstract
Background: In Germany today, one-third of the 20 million women of child-bearing age use combined oral contraceptives (COCs). In this article, we summarize the current knowledge of the mode of action, wanted and unwanted side effects, and long-term risks of COCs. The levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD) and long-acting injectable or implantable monophasic progestogen preparations offer comparable contraceptive efficacy to COCs. Nonetheless, they are less frequently used in Germany than COCs, because of their propensity to cause breakthrough bleeding.
Method: Selective review of the literature.
Results: COCs suppress gonadotropin secretion and thereby inhibit follicular maturation and ovulation. Their correct use is associated with 0.3 pregnancies per 100 women per year, their typical use, with 1 pregnancy per 100 women per year (Pearl index). COCs have effects on the cardiovascular and hemostatic systems as well as on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. When given in the presence of specific risk factors, they significantly increase the likelihood of cardiovascular disease and thromboembolism. Women with persistent human papilloma virus (HPV) infection who take COCs are at increased risk of developing invasive cervical cancer. On the other hand, COCs lower the cumulative incidence of endometrial and ovarian cancer by 30% to 50%, and that of colorectal cancer by 20% to 30%. Other malignancies seem to be unaffected by COC use.
Conclusion: As long as personal and familial risk factors are carefully considered, COCs constitute a safe, reversible, and well-tolerated method of contraception.
Figures
Comment in
-
Correspondence (letter to the editor): Side effects.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Nov;108(45):768; author reply 769-70. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0768a. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011. PMID: 22163253 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Correspondence (letter to the editor): Risk of venous thromboembolism.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Nov;108(45):768; author reply 769-70. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0768b. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011. PMID: 22163254 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Correspondence (letter to the editor): Alternatives.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Nov;108(45):768-9; author reply 769-70. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0768c. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011. PMID: 22163255 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Correspondence (letter to the editor): Serious concerns.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Nov;108(45):769; author reply 769-70. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0769a. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011. PMID: 22163256 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The combined oral contraceptive. Risks and adverse effects in perspective.Drug Saf. 1995 Feb;12(2):91-6. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199512020-00002. Drug Saf. 1995. PMID: 7766340 Review.
-
Combined oral contraceptives: risks and benefits.Br Med Bull. 1993 Jan;49(1):124-39. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072592. Br Med Bull. 1993. PMID: 8324603 Review.
-
Thrombotic risks of oral contraceptives.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;24(4):235-40. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328355871d. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22729096 Review.
-
Oral contraceptive agents.Med J Aust. 1986 Feb 17;144(4):201-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1986.tb128358.x. Med J Aust. 1986. PMID: 3945219
-
The progestin-only pills and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: two progestin-only contraceptives.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Dec;38(4):872-89. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199538040-00022. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1995. PMID: 8616983 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of reproductive history and exogenous hormone use on prevalence and frequency of circulating t(14;18)-positive cells in a population-based cross-sectional study.Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Mar;26(3):455-65. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0525-4. Epub 2015 Jan 30. Cancer Causes Control. 2015. PMID: 25634026 Free PMC article.
-
Dyslipidemia and associated factors among women using hormonal contraceptives in Harar town, Eastern Ethiopia.BMC Res Notes. 2019 Mar 4;12(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4148-9. BMC Res Notes. 2019. PMID: 30832721 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of liver function tests of women taking hormonal contraceptives at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital and Family Guidance Association of Gondar (FGAE), 2022; a comparative cross-sectional study.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0289746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289746. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37590278 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of combined oral contraceptives on ocular tissues: a review of ocular effects.Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 18;10(10):1604-1610. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.10.19. eCollection 2017. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 29062782 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Correspondence (letter to the editor): Serious concerns.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Nov;108(45):769; author reply 769-70. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0769a. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011. PMID: 22163256 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- WHO. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/97892... 4th. Geneva: WHO; 2009. Medical elegibility criteria for contraceptive use.
-
- Kuhl H. Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration. Climacteric. 2005;8(Suppl 1):3–63. - PubMed
-
- Dinger J, Minh TD, Buttmann N, Bardenheuer K. Effectiveness of oral contraceptive pills in a large US. cohort comparing progestogen and regimen. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:33–40. - PubMed
-
- Rosenberg M, Waugh MS. Causes and consequences of oral contraceptive noncompliance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:276–279. - PubMed
-
- Mansour D, Inki P, Gemzell-Danielson K. Efficacy of contraceptive methods: a review of the literature. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010;15:4–16. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials