Hormonal contraception--what kind, when, and for whom?
- PMID: 21814535
- PMCID: PMC3149298
- DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0495
Hormonal contraception--what kind, when, and for whom?
Abstract
Background: In Germany today, one-third of the 20 million women of child-bearing age use combined oral contraceptives (COCs). In this article, we summarize the current knowledge of the mode of action, wanted and unwanted side effects, and long-term risks of COCs. The levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD) and long-acting injectable or implantable monophasic progestogen preparations offer comparable contraceptive efficacy to COCs. Nonetheless, they are less frequently used in Germany than COCs, because of their propensity to cause breakthrough bleeding.
Method: Selective review of the literature.
Results: COCs suppress gonadotropin secretion and thereby inhibit follicular maturation and ovulation. Their correct use is associated with 0.3 pregnancies per 100 women per year, their typical use, with 1 pregnancy per 100 women per year (Pearl index). COCs have effects on the cardiovascular and hemostatic systems as well as on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. When given in the presence of specific risk factors, they significantly increase the likelihood of cardiovascular disease and thromboembolism. Women with persistent human papilloma virus (HPV) infection who take COCs are at increased risk of developing invasive cervical cancer. On the other hand, COCs lower the cumulative incidence of endometrial and ovarian cancer by 30% to 50%, and that of colorectal cancer by 20% to 30%. Other malignancies seem to be unaffected by COC use.
Conclusion: As long as personal and familial risk factors are carefully considered, COCs constitute a safe, reversible, and well-tolerated method of contraception.
Figures
Comment in
-
Correspondence (letter to the editor): Side effects.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Nov;108(45):768; author reply 769-70. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0768a. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011. PMID: 22163253 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Correspondence (letter to the editor): Risk of venous thromboembolism.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Nov;108(45):768; author reply 769-70. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0768b. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011. PMID: 22163254 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Correspondence (letter to the editor): Alternatives.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Nov;108(45):768-9; author reply 769-70. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0768c. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011. PMID: 22163255 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Correspondence (letter to the editor): Serious concerns.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Nov;108(45):769; author reply 769-70. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0769a. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011. PMID: 22163256 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- WHO. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/97892... 4th. Geneva: WHO; 2009. Medical elegibility criteria for contraceptive use.
-
- Kuhl H. Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration. Climacteric. 2005;8(Suppl 1):3–63. - PubMed
-
- Dinger J, Minh TD, Buttmann N, Bardenheuer K. Effectiveness of oral contraceptive pills in a large US. cohort comparing progestogen and regimen. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:33–40. - PubMed
-
- Rosenberg M, Waugh MS. Causes and consequences of oral contraceptive noncompliance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:276–279. - PubMed
-
- Mansour D, Inki P, Gemzell-Danielson K. Efficacy of contraceptive methods: a review of the literature. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010;15:4–16. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
