Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:7:31-8.
doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0085-1. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

The role of response modalities in cognitive task representations

Andrea M Philipp, Iring Koch

The role of response modalities in cognitive task representations

Andrea M Philipp et al. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2011.

Abstract

The execution of a task necessitates the use of a specific response modality. We examined the role of different response modalities by using a task-switching paradigm. In Experiment 1, subjects switched between two numerical judgments, whereas response modality (vocal vs. manual vs. foot responses) was manipulated between groups. We found judgment-shift costs in each group, that is irrespective of the response modality. In Experiment 2, subjects switched between response modalities (vocal vs. manual, vocal vs. foot, or manual vs. foot). We observed response-modality shift costs that were comparable in all groups. In sum, the experiments suggest that the response modality (combination) does not affect switching per se. Yet, modality-shift costs occur when subjects switch between response modalities. Thus, we suppose that modality-shift costs are not due to a purely motor-related mechanisms but rather emerge from a general switching process. Consequently, the response modality has to be considered as a cognitive component in models of task switching.

Keywords: cognitive control; motor control; response modalities; task representation; task switching.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adam J. J., Backes W., Rijcken J., Hofman P., Kuipers H., Jolles J. Rapid visuomotor preparation in the human brain: A functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research. 2003;16:1–10. - PubMed
    1. Allport D. A., Styles E. A., Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: Umiltà C., Moscovitch M., editors. Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994. pp. 421–452.
    1. Arrington C., Altmann E., Carr T. Tasks of a feather flock together: Similarity effects in task switching. Memory & Cognition. 2003;31:781–789. - PubMed
    1. Brass M., von Cramon D. Y. How motor-related is cognitive control? In: Haggard P., Rossetti Y., editors. Attention and performance XXII: Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition. Harvard: Harvard University Press; 2007. pp. 101–119.
    1. Braver T. S., Reynolds J. R., Donaldson D. I. Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron. 2003;39:713–726. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources