Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug 8:11:37.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-37.

Disparities exist between National food group recommendations and the dietary intakes of women

Michelle L Blumfield  1 , Alexis J Hure, Lesley K Macdonald-Wicks, Amanda J Patterson, Roger Smith, Clare E Collins
Affiliations

Disparities exist between National food group recommendations and the dietary intakes of women

Michelle L Blumfield et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Preconception and pregnancy dietary intakes can influence the health of future generations. In this study we compared the food intakes of reproductive-aged women by pregnancy status, to current Australian recommendations.

Methods: Data are from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, younger cohort aged 25-30 years in 2003, with self-reported status as pregnant (n = 606), trying to conceive (n = 454), given birth in the last 12 months (n = 829) or other (n = 5597). Diet was assessed using a validated 74-item food frequency questionnaire. Food group servings and nutrient intakes were compared to the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGHE) and Australian Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs).

Results: No women met all AGHE food group recommendations. Highest adherence rates [mean (95% CI) servings/day] were for meat [85%, 1.9(1.8-1.9)], fruit [44%, 2.1(2.1-2.2)] and dairy [35%, 1.8(1.8-1.9)], with < 14% meeting remaining recommendations. Women who achieved NRVs (folate, iron, calcium, zinc, fibre) for pregnancy, breastfeeding and adult life stages were 1.5%, 3.3% and 13.7%, respectively. Compared to AGHE, women consumed more servings of fruit (4.9 vs 4.0;P = 0.034) and dairy (3.4 vs 2.0;P = 0.006) to achieve pregnancy NRVs; more dairy (2.9 vs 2.0;P = 0.001), less fruit (3.9 vs 5.0;P < .001) and vegetables (3.4 vs 7.0;P < .001) to achieve breastfeeding NRVs; more fruit (3.6 vs 3.0;P < .001), dairy (2.5 vs 2.0;P < .001), meat (1.8 vs 1.5;P = 0.015), less vegetables (3.6 vs 5.0;P < .001) to achieve adult NRVs.

Conclusions: The AGHE does not align with contemporary diets of Australian women or enable them to meet all NRVs. Current tools to guide food consumption by women during pregnancy require revision.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. In: Developmental origins of health and disease. Gluckman P, Hanson M, editor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006. The conceptual basis for the developmental origins of health and disease; pp. 33–50.
    1. Kind KL, Moore VM, Davies MJ. Diet around conception and during pregnancy-Effects on fetal and neonatal outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:532–541. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61178-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scholl TO. Maternal nutrition before and during pregnancy. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program. 2008;61:79–89. - PubMed
    1. USDA Agricultural Research Service. Food and Nutrient Intakes by Individuals in the United States, by Sex and Age, 1994-1996, Nationwide Food Surveys Report No. 96-2. Washington. 1998.
    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Nutrition Survey Nutrient Intakes and Physical Measurements Australia 1995. Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia; 1998.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources