Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;121(9):3645-56.
doi: 10.1172/JCI46274. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

Regulatory B cells are identified by expression of TIM-1 and can be induced through TIM-1 ligation to promote tolerance in mice

Affiliations

Regulatory B cells are identified by expression of TIM-1 and can be induced through TIM-1 ligation to promote tolerance in mice

Qing Ding et al. J Clin Invest. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

T cell Ig domain and mucin domain protein 1 (TIM-1) is a costimulatory molecule that regulates immune responses by modulating CD4+ T cell effector differentiation. However, the function of TIM-1 on other immune cell populations is unknown. Here, we show that in vivo in mice, TIM-1 is predominantly expressed on B rather than T cells. Importantly, TIM-1 was expressed by a large majority of IL-10-expressing regulatory B cells in all major B cell subpopulations, including transitional, marginal zone, and follicular B cells, as well as the B cell population characterized as CD1d(hi)CD5+. A low-affinity TIM-1-specific antibody that normally promotes tolerance in mice, actually accelerated (T cell-mediated) immune responsiveness in the absence of B cells. TIM-1+ B cells were highly enriched for IL-4 and IL-10 expression, promoted Th2 responses, and could directly transfer allograft tolerance. Both cytokine expression and number of TIM-1+ regulatory B cells (Bregs) were induced by TIM-1-specific antibody, and this was dependent on IL-4 signaling. Thus, TIM-1 is an inclusive marker for IL-10+ Bregs that can be induced by TIM-1 ligation. These findings suggest that TIM-1 may be a novel therapeutic target for modulating the immune response and provide insight into the signals involved in the generation and induction of Bregs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. B lymphocytes express relatively high levels of TIM-1.
(A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing TIM-1 expression on splenic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and CD19+ B cells in naive BALB/c mice or at 14 days after immunization with either allogeneic (B6) islet transplantation (Txpl) or OVA (20 μg with 4 mg alum i.p. on days 0 and 7). Cell staining was performed in the presence of anti-CD16/CD32 to block FcR binding, and isotype- and fluorochrome-matched negative controls were used to set the cursors. Isotype control staining for CD19+ cells is shown at right. n ≥ 3 per group. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots showing TIM-1 expression on CD19+ B cells from naive mice assessed by indirect staining with anti–TIM-1 mAbs RMT1-10, RMT1-4, and 3B3 followed by PE-conjugated anti-rat Ig secondary mAb. n = 3 per group. (C) Anti–TIM-1 immunoblot of cell lysates from sort-purified T cells, B cells, TIM-1+ B cells, and TIM-1 B cells. Representative of 2 independent experiments. Numbers denote percent TIM-1+ cells within each population.
Figure 2
Figure 2. B lymphocytes are required for anti–TIM-1–mediated prolongation of allograft survival.
(A) Chemically diabetic BALB/c mice were untreated or subjected to B cell depletion with anti-CD20 (250 μg i.v. on days –14 and –1) followed by transplantation with B6 islets. Allograft recipients were either untreated or treated with RMT1-10 or control Ig at 0.5 mg (day –1) and 0.3 mg (days 0 and 5). (B) JHD mice were unmanipulated or received 107 WT syngeneic B cells followed by transplantation with B6 islets (day 0). Allograft recipients were treated as in A. Shown are Kaplan-Meir plots of graft survival. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. untreated or control Ig; #P < 0.05 vs. other anti-CD20 groups; P < 0.01 vs. B cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3. B lymphocytes are required for Th2-deviation induced by anti–TIM-1.
IL-4 EGFP reporter mice (BALB/c) were untreated or subjected to B cell depletion with anti-CD20 followed by transplantation with B6 islets. Allograft recipients were either untreated or treated with anti–TIM-1 or control Ig as in Figure 2. On day 14 after transplantation, cytokine expression on splenic CD4+ T cells was examined by flow cytometry after in vitro stimulation (see Methods). IL-4 was detected by EGFP expression, and IFN-γ, IL-10, and Foxp3 were detected by intracellular staining. (A) Representative IL-4, IFN-γ, and IL-10 expression on CD4+ T cells, determined by flow cytometry. n ≥ 5 mice/group. (B) Representative Foxp3 and IL-10 expression by CD4+ T cells, determined by flow cytometry. n = 3 mice/group. (C) Frequency (mean + SD) gated on CD4+ T cells expressing IFN-γ, IL-4, or IL-10 in naive mice or allograft recipients treated as indicated. n ≥ 5 mice/group. *P < 0.05 vs. untreated or control Ig–treated allograft recipients; P < 0.05 vs. other anti-CD20–treated allograft recipients; #P < 0.05 vs. anti–TIM-1–treated allograft recipients. Numbers denote percent of gated cells within the respective quadrants.
Figure 4
Figure 4. IL-4 and IL-10 are expressed by TIM-1+ B cells and induced by TIM-1 ligation.
Splenic CD19+ B cells from BALB/c mice were naive, transplanted with B6 islets, or transplanted and treated with anti–TIM-1 or control Ig on day 14. (A) IL-4 and IL-10 expression, gated on CD19+ B cells (control and total B cells) or on TIM-1 and TIM-1+ B cells. IL-4 (EGFP) versus control (WT littermates); IL-10 (intracellular staining) versus control (isotype). (B) Frequency (mean + SD) of B cells expressing cytokines from mice in A. *P < 0.05 vs. naive; #P < 0.05 vs. all other groups. (C) Frequency (mean + SD) of cytokine expression on TIM-1 versus TIM-1+ B cells from anti–TIM-1–treated allograft recipients. *P < 0.01 vs. TIM-1. (D) TIM-1 expression (mean + SD) on B, CD4+ T, and CD8+ T cells. *P < 0.05 vs. naive; #P < 0.05 vs. all other groups. (E) Total number (mean + SD) of splenic B and CD4+ T cells. (AE) n ≥ 5 mice/group in at least 3 experiments. (F and G) Sorted TIM-1 “index” B cells (see Methods) from naive BALB/c mice were transferred into syngeneic JHD (F) or RAG2-KO (G) mice. Recipients were naive or were exposed to alloantigen (allograft or allogeneic splenocytes) with or without anti–TIM-1 or control Ig. TIM-1 expression on index B cells recovered from spleen (day 14) is shown in representative dot plots (F), or as frequency (G; mean + SD). n = 3 mice/group. *P < 0.05 vs. no allograft; #P < 0.01 vs. all other groups. Numbers denote percent cells in the respective quadrants.
Figure 5
Figure 5. B cell–mediated prolongation of allograft survival requires IL-4–dependent TIM-1 and IL-10 expression.
Diabetic JHD recipients of C57B/6 allografts were reconstituted with 107 naive B cells from WT, Il4–/–, Il4ra–/–, or Il10–/– mice and treated with anti–TIM-1. (A) Kaplan-Meir plots of graft survival. *P < 0.01, **P < 0.05 vs. untreated. TIM-1 (B) and IL-10 (C) expression (mean + SD) on transferred B cells (day 14), detected by flow cytometry. *P < 0.01 vs. WT; #P < 0.05 vs. Il4ra–/–. (D) Representative IL-4, IFN-γ, and IL-10 expression, assessed by flow cytometry, on endogenous CD4+ T cells 14 days after B cell transfer in the JHD recipients. Numbers denote percent CD4+ T cells expressing IL-4, IFN-γ, and IL-10. (E) Sorted index B cells from naive BALB/c mice were adoptively transferred into syngeneic RAG2-KO recipients of B6 islets. Mice received 107 sort-purified congenic TIM-1, TIM-1+, or Il4–/– TIM-1+ B cells from allostimulated BALB/c mice. Alternatively, mice received 107 sort-purified CD4+ T cells from WT or Il4–/– BALB/c mice (naive, allostimulated, or allostimulated and treated with anti–TIM-1). Shown is frequency (mean + SD) of TIM-1 expression on index B cells in spleen 14 days after transfer. **P < 0.05 vs. other groups. (BE) n = 3 mice/group.
Figure 6
Figure 6. TIM-1+ B cells prolong allograft survival in a donor-specific and IL-10–dependent manner.
(A) WT, Il4ra–/–, or Il10–/– BALB/c recipients of B6 islets were treated with anti–TIM-1. On day 14, splenic TIM-1+ and TIM-1 B cells were sort-purified and transferred (107) into otherwise-untreated JHD recipients of islet allografts from the same (B6) strain. Shown are Kaplan-Meir plots of graft survival. #P < 0.01 vs. all other groups; *P < 0.05 vs. untreated. (B) TIM-1+ B cells from spleen of naive BALB/c mice or from untreated BALB/c recipients of B6 or C3H islet allografts (day 14) were sort-purified and transferred (107) into JHD recipients of B6 islets without further treatment. Shown are Kaplan-Meir plots of graft survival. #P < 0.01 vs. other groups. (C) JHD IL-4 EGFP (JHD×4get) recipients of B6 islets were untreated or received 107 TIM-1+ or TIM-1 B cells from anti–TIM-1–treated BALB/c allograft recipients as in A. Shown is representative IL-4 (EGFP) or IFN-γ, IL-10, and Foxp3 (intracellular staining) expression by flow cytometry on splenic CD4+ T cells from recipients 14 days after receiving TIM-1+, TIM-1, or no B cells. Numbers denote percent CD4+ T cells expressing IL-4, IFN-γ, IL-10, or Foxp3. n = 3 mice/group.
Figure 7
Figure 7. TIM-1+ B cells are highly enriched for IL-10 expression across a wide spectrum of phenotypes.
BALB/c splenocytes were assessed for expression of various cell surface markers and IL-10 by multicolor flow cytometry. n = 3–6 mice/group in at least 3 independent experiments. (A) Left: Representative expression of CD5 versus CD1d on CD19+ B cells in naive mice with the CD1dhiCD5+ population (2.3% of total B cells; rectangular gate). Right: IL-10 and TIM-1 expression on CD19+ (total B) and on TIM-1+ and TIM-1 B cells within the CD1dhiCD5+ and non-CD1dhiCD5+ B cell populations. (B) Representative expression of markers on CD19+IL-10+ B cells. Cells within the IL-10+ B cell gate were assessed for CD1d and CD5 or TIM-1 expression. (C) Percent (mean + SD) B cells expressing TIM-1 within FO, MZ, T2-MZ, T1, CD1dhiCD5+, and B1 B cells from naive and transplanted mice with or without anti–TIM-1 or control Ig treatment. *P < 0.05 vs. naive; #P < 0.05 vs. other allograft recipients. (D) IL-10 expression (mean + SD) on B cell subpopulations and mice as in C. *P < 0.05 vs. other total B cell groups; #P < 0.05 vs. other TIM-1+ B cell groups. P < 0.05, TIM-1+ vs. TIM-1 (all groups). Numbers denote percent cells within the designated areas.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Model of TIM-1+IL-10+ Breg induction.
TIM-1+ B cells account for most IL-4+ and IL-10+ B cells, and both cytokines and TIM-1 itself can be induced by anti–TIM-1 in the face of BCR ligation. B cell IL-4 is required to promote IL-4 expression by Th2 cells in the allograft setting. IL-4 receptor signaling in B cells is essential both for TIM-1 expression and for IL-10 production by B cells. IL-4 can be derived from either B cells themselves or from Th2 cells. IL-10 expression is required for Breg activity, but not for TIM-1 expression.

References

    1. Kuchroo VK, Dardalhon V, Xiao S, Anderson AC. New roles for TIM family members in immune regulation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(8):577–580. doi: 10.1038/nri2366. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McIntire JJ, et al. Identification of Tapr (an airway hyperreactivity regulatory locus) and the linked Tim gene family. Nat Immunol. 2001;2(12):1109–1116. doi: 10.1038/ni739. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chae SC, Park YR, Song JH, Shim SC, Yoon KS, Chung HT. The polymorphisms of Tim-1 promoter region are associated with rheumatoid arthritis in a Korean population. Immunogenetics. 2005;56(10):696–701. doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0743-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Umetsu SE, et al. TIM-1 induces T cell activation and inhibits the development of peripheral tolerance. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(5):447–454. doi: 10.1038/ni1186. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meyers JH, et al. TIM-4 is the ligand for TIM-1, and the TIM-1-TIM-4 interaction regulates T cell proliferation. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(5):455–464. doi: 10.1038/ni1185. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms