Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1990 Apr;37(3):333-6.
doi: 10.1007/BF03005585.

Comparison of lidocaine CO2, two per cent lidocaine hydrochloride and pH adjusted lidocaine hydrochloride for caesarean section anesthesia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of lidocaine CO2, two per cent lidocaine hydrochloride and pH adjusted lidocaine hydrochloride for caesarean section anesthesia

D J Liepert et al. Can J Anaesth. 1990 Apr.

Abstract

Lidocaine can be prepared in a variety of ways which may affect the characteristics of neural blockade achieved. Experimental evidence is equivocal as to the clinical impact of the use of different lidocaine preparations. A randomized, double-blind study was performed to investigate the differences in epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section using three different lidocaine solutions: lidocaine CO2, two per cent lidocaine and two per cent lidocaine with its pH adjusted by the addition of bicarbonate. No differences were found among the groups in time of onset of neural blockade, quality or duration of neural blockade, time to delivery of the infant or volume of anaesthetic solution injected into the epidural space. A significant difference was found between the pH's of the solutions used. It is concluded that all three solutions are equally efficacious in epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Can Med Assoc J. 1967 Dec 2;97(23):1377-84 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 1986 Jul;65(7):760-4 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 1987 Jan;66(1):9-17 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 1987 Feb;66(2):159-65 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 1988 Jan;67(1):48-52 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources