Magnetic resonance elastography and biomarkers to assess fibrosis from recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients
- PMID: 21822174
- DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31822805fa
Magnetic resonance elastography and biomarkers to assess fibrosis from recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients
Abstract
Background: Imaging techniques evaluating liver stiffness (magnetic resonance elastography [MRE]) and biomarkers may be useful indicators of fibrosis stage in hepatitis C virus (HCV)+patients. Our aim was to compare the accuracy of MRE and biomarkers in staging fibrosis because of recurrent HCV in liver transplant (LT) recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Methods: Liver magnetic resonance imaging and MRE, FIBROSpectII, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (aspartate aminotransferase [AST]: platelet index), AST:alanine aminotransferase ratio, and magnetic resonance imaging/MRE-guided biopsies targeting the stiffest regions (right and left lobes) were performed in HCV+LT recipients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV)/negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios were calculated for the best cutoff by receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Results: Thirty-two recipients were included: 28 men, age 60 (±6.4) years, and time since LT 3.25 (±1.68) years. Both MRE (P=0.0001) and FIBROSpectII (P=0.009) were significantly different between no fibrosis and more than or equal to stage 1 groups, whereas aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and AST:alanine aminotransferase ratio were not different. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.87 for MRE and 0.84 for FIBROSpectII. MRE cutoff of 3.81 kPa had 87.5% sensitivity, 79.2% specificity, 58.3% PPV, and 95.0% NPV; FIBROSpectII cutoff of 42 had 87.5% sensitivity, 70.0% specificity, 53.8% PPV, and 93.3% NPV for detection of more than or equal to stage 1 fibrosis. Two patients had high MRE values because of unexpected acute rejection and portal vein thrombosis.
Conclusions: MRE and FIBROSpectII are highly sensitive in detecting fibrosis due to recurrent HCV. Both are limited by the low specificity/PPV and confounding because of other graft complications. Values below the MRE and FIBROSpectII cutoffs, however, strongly suggest the absence of fibrosis and may avert the need for protocol biopsy staging.
Similar articles
-
Role of AST to platelet ratio index in the detection of liver fibrosis in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Nov;22(11):1904-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04628.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007. PMID: 17914968
-
Assessment of graft fibrosis by transient elastography in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation.Transplantation. 2008 Jan 15;85(1):69-74. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000297248.18483.16. Transplantation. 2008. PMID: 18192914 Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography (FibroScan) versus the aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index in assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B: the role in primary care setting.J Clin Pathol. 2011 Oct;64(10):916-20. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200044. Epub 2011 Jun 13. J Clin Pathol. 2011. PMID: 21670074
-
Performance of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index for the staging of hepatitis C-related fibrosis: an updated meta-analysis.Hepatology. 2011 Mar;53(3):726-36. doi: 10.1002/hep.24105. Epub 2011 Feb 11. Hepatology. 2011. PMID: 21319189 Review.
-
Non-invasive assessment of fibrosis in liver grafts due to hepatitis C virus recurrence.Clin Transplant. 2011 May-Jun;25(3):345-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01396.x. Epub 2011 Apr 25. Clin Transplant. 2011. PMID: 21517974 Review.
Cited by
-
Role of liver biopsy in the era of direct-acting antivirals.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2013 Feb;15(2):307. doi: 10.1007/s11894-012-0307-z. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23319086 Review.
-
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis recurrence after liver transplant.Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Apr 5;5:24. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2019.10.12. eCollection 2020. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. PMID: 32258528 Free PMC article. Review.
-
General review of magnetic resonance elastography.World J Radiol. 2016 Jan 28;8(1):59-72. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i1.59. World J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26834944 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver].Radiologe. 2012 Aug;52(8):738-44. doi: 10.1007/s00117-012-2311-6. Radiologe. 2012. PMID: 22777306 German.
-
Comparison between ROI-based and volumetric measurements in quantifying heterogeneity of liver stiffness using MR elastography.Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1609-1615. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06478-0. Epub 2019 Nov 8. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31705257
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical