Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Sep-Oct;2(5):669-85.
doi: 10.1002/wrna.82. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

Uridine insertion/deletion editing in trypanosomes: a playground for RNA-guided information transfer

Affiliations
Review

Uridine insertion/deletion editing in trypanosomes: a playground for RNA-guided information transfer

Ruslan Aphasizhev et al. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2011 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

RNA editing is a collective term referring to enzymatic processes that change RNA sequence apart from splicing, 5' capping or 3' extension. In this article, we focus on uridine insertion/deletion mRNA editing found exclusively in mitochondria of kinetoplastid protists. This type of editing corrects frameshifts, introduces start and stops codons, and often adds much of the coding sequence to create an open reading frame. The mitochondrial genome of trypanosomatids, the most extensively studied clade within the order Kinetoplastida, is composed of ∼50 maxicircles with limited coding capacity and thousands of minicircles. To produce functional mRNAs, a multitude of nuclear-encoded factors mediate interactions of maxicircle-encoded pre-mRNAs with a vast repertoire of minicircle-encoded guide RNAs. Editing reactions of mRNA cleavage, U-insertions or U-deletions, and ligation are catalyzed by the RNA editing core complex (RECC, the 20S editosome) while each step of this enzymatic cascade is directed by guide RNAs. These 50-60 nucleotide (nt) molecules are 3' uridylated by RET1 TUTase and stabilized via association with the gRNA binding complex (GRBC). Remarkably, the information transfer between maxicircle and minicircle transcriptomes does not rely on template-dependent polymerization of nucleic acids. Instead, intrinsic substrate specificities of key enzymes are largely responsible for the fidelity of editing. Conversely, the efficiency of editing is enhanced by assembling enzymes and RNA binding proteins into stable multiprotein complexes. WIREs RNA 2011 2 669-685 DOI: 10.1002/wrna.82 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Modular organization of the RNA editing core complex (RECC). Direct protein-protein interactions within core complex are depicted by overlapping squares or black bars. SC, subcomplex; FR: mRNA cleavage fragment. Trans-guided insertion and deletion, and cis-guided insertion pathways are diagramed on the same background as corresponding endonuclease modules.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Components of the RNA editing core complex from T. brucei. Domain organization is reproduced with permission from Ref. Pum: Pumilio motif; PAPcat: catalytic domain shared among members of DNA polymerase β superfamily; MD: middle domain; PAP CTD: C-terminal base recognition domain. White Z on dark background: C2H2-type zinc finger; OB-fold: oligonucleotide binding fold. Black Z on light background: U1-like C2H2 zinc finger; RNase III: RNase III catalytic-like domain; dsRBM: double-stranded RNA binding motif; RNase III-Pum: overlapping RNase III-like and Pumilio motifs; Endo-Exo-Phos: endonuclease-exonuclease-phosphatase family motif. Ligase: polynucleotide ligase-mRNA capping catalytic domain.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Low-resolution structures of the editing core complex. A. Reconstitution of the RECC from L. tarentolae. Shaded surface representation of 3 individual anti-REL1 IgG-decorated L-complex particles segmented out from the 3D tomogram (in yellow). The putative IgG densities are indicated by circling. Approximate location of REL1 on unbiased single-particle reconstruction (in blue) is shown by arrow. Reproduced with permission from Ref. B. Consensus model of the T. brucei ~20S complex displaying a bipartite shape. Landmarks are labeled. Reproduced with permission from Ref.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Domain organization and UTP selectivity of mitochondrial TUTases. A. Ribbon representation illustrating the UTP bound in the deep cleft formed by the NTD and the CTD (left panel). Structural superpositions of TbMEAT1 with TbRET2 (gray) depict the overall differences in these structures, which become increasingly evident away from the active site (right panel). B. Mechanisms of UTP specificity. Hydrogen bonds involved in uracil-base-specific interactions are depicted as green arrows. Invariant aspartic acid residues are indicated by asterisks.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Major RNA editing complexes and factors. GRBC- and RET1-centered assemblies are likely to be more complex and participate in biogenesis of editing substrates.

References

    1. Benne R, Van den Burg J, Brakenhoff J, Sloof P, Van Boom J, Tromp M. Major transcript of the frameshifted coxII gene from trypanosome mitochondria contains four nucleotides that are not encoded in the DNA. Cell. 1986;46:819–826. - PubMed
    1. Feagin JE, Abraham J, Stuart K. Extensive editing of the cytochrome c oxidase III transcript in Trypanosoma brucei. Cell. 1988;53:413–422. - PubMed
    1. Shaw J, Feagin JE, Stuart K, Simpson L. Editing of mitochondrial mRNAs by uridine addition and deletion generates conserved amino acid sequences and AUG initiation codons. Cell. 1988;53:401–411. - PubMed
    1. Blum B, Bakalara N, Simpson L. A model for RNA editing in kinetoplastid mitochondria: “Guide” RNA molecules transcribed from maxicircle DNA provide the edited information. Cell. 1990;60:189–198. - PubMed
    1. Sturm NR, Simpson L. Kinetoplast DNA minicircles encode guide RNAs for editing of cytochrome oxidase subunit III mRNA. Cell. 1990;61:879–884. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms