A systematic methodology for selecting decontamination strategies following a biocontamination event
- PMID: 21823924
- DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0071
A systematic methodology for selecting decontamination strategies following a biocontamination event
Abstract
Decontamination and recovery of a facility or outdoor area after a wide-area biological incident involving a highly persistent agent (eg, Bacillus anthracis spores) is a complex process that requires extensive information and significant resources, which are likely to be limited, particularly if multiple facilities or areas are affected. This article proposes a systematic methodology for evaluating information to select the decontamination or alternative treatments that optimize use of resources if decontamination is required for the facility or area. The methodology covers a wide range of approaches, including volumetric and surface decontamination, monitored natural attenuation, and seal and abandon strategies. A proposed trade-off analysis can help decision makers understand the relative appropriateness, efficacy, and labor, skill, and cost requirements of the various decontamination methods for the particular facility or area needing treatment--whether alone or as part of a larger decontamination effort. Because the state of decontamination knowledge and technology continues to evolve rapidly, the methodology presented here is designed to accommodate new strategies and materials and changing information.
Similar articles
-
A biological decontamination process for small, privately owned buildings.Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Sep;9(3):301-9. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0025. Biosecur Bioterror. 2011. PMID: 21882971
-
Responding to biological incidents--what are the current issues in remediation of the contaminated environment?Environ Int. 2014 Nov;72:133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 Feb 12. Environ Int. 2014. PMID: 24530001
-
The challenge of determining the need for remediation following a wide-area biological release.Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Sep;9(3):257-61. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0045. Biosecur Bioterror. 2011. PMID: 21882967
-
Decontamination after a release of B. anthracis spores.Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Mar;10(1):108-22. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0095. Epub 2012 Feb 21. Biosecur Bioterror. 2012. PMID: 22352747 Review.
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
Cited by
-
Predicting response to reassurances and uncertainties in bioterrorism communications for urban populations in New York and California.Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Jun;10(2):188-202. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0100. Epub 2012 May 14. Biosecur Bioterror. 2012. PMID: 22582813 Free PMC article.
-
Inactivation of Bacillus anthracis spores to decontaminate subway railcar and related materials via the fogging of peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide sporicidal liquids.J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 15;206:800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.027. Epub 2017 Nov 22. J Environ Manage. 2018. PMID: 29174643 Free PMC article.
-
Improved virus concentration methods for wash waters from decontamination of permeable and non-permeable surfaces.J Virol Methods. 2023 Dec;322:114826. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114826. Epub 2023 Sep 29. J Virol Methods. 2023. PMID: 37778537 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources