Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Oct;74(4):869-75.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Aug 6.

Usefulness of cap-assisted colonoscopy during colonoscopic EMR: a randomized, controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Usefulness of cap-assisted colonoscopy during colonoscopic EMR: a randomized, controlled trial

Seon-Young Park et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Clinical demand for total colonoscopy is increasing. Several articles have reported on the usefulness of a cap for faster cecal intubation and reduced patient discomfort, but results for polyp and adenoma detection have been inconsistent.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of a cap attached to the tip of a colonoscope for detection and resection of polyps by experienced colonoscopists.

Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: A tertiary referral center.

Patients and intervention: A total of 329 patients who underwent colonoscopic EMR were randomized to cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) (CAC group, n = 166) or regular colonoscopy (RC) (RC group, n = 163).

Main outcome measurements: Cecal intubation time, total procedure time, required time for colonoscopic EMR of each polyp, and missing polyp rate.

Results: The cecal intubation time in the CAC group and RC group was 5.3 ± 3.3 minutes and 5.8 ± 3.7 minutes, respectively (P = .170). The total procedure time in the CAC group and RC group was 23.0 ± 15.5 minutes and 29.2 ± 13.4 minutes, respectively (P = .626). The time required for colonoscopic EMR of each polyp in the CAC group and RC group was 3.5 ± 4.5 minutes and 4.2 ± 5.1 minutes, respectively (P = .010). The number of polyps during the initial colonoscopy in the CAC group and RC group was 2.2 ± 1.7 and 2.0 ± 1.8, respectively (P = .221). The number of detected polyps during colonoscopic EMR in the CAC group and RC group was 3.4 ± 2.7 and 2.7 ± 1.9 (P = .003). The number of missed polyps in the CAC group and RC group was 1.1 ± 1.5 and 0.8 ± 0.9 (P = .024).

Limitation: Single-center experience.

Conclusions: CAC may reduce the time required for colonoscopic EMR of each polyp and may also improve the polyp detection rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types