Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;118(3):505-512.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182267f43.

Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' practice bulletins

Jason D Wright  1 , Neha Pawar, Julie S R Gonzalez, Sharyn N Lewin, William M Burke, Lynn L Simpson, Abigail S Charles, Mary E D'Alton, Thomas J Herzog
Affiliations

Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' practice bulletins

Jason D Wright et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Clinical guidelines are an important source of guidance for clinicians. Few studies have examined the quality of scientific data underlying evidence-based guidelines. We examined the quality of evidence that underlies the recommendations made by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College).

Methods: The current practice bulletins of the College were examined. Each bulletin makes multiple recommendations. Each recommendation is categorized based on the quality and quantity of evidence that underlies the recommendation into one of three levels of evidence: A (good and consistent evidence), B (limited or inconsistent evidence), or C (consensus and opinion). We analyzed the distribution of levels of evidence for obstetrics and gynecology recommendations.

Results: A total of 84 practice bulletins that offered 717 individual recommendations were identified. Forty-eight (57.1%) of the guidelines were obstetric and 36 (42.9%) were gynecologic. When all recommendations were considered, 215 (30.0%) provided level A evidence, 270 (37.7%) level B, and 232 (32.3%) level C. Among obstetric recommendations, 93 (25.5%) were level A, 145 (39.7%) level B, and 117 (34.8%) level C. For the gynecologic recommendations, 122 (34.7%) were level A, 125 (35.5%) level B, and 105 (29.8%) level C. The gynecology recommendations were more likely to be of level A evidence than the obstetrics recommendations (P=.049).

Conclusion: One third of the recommendations put forth by the College in its practice bulletins are based on good and consistent scientific evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Other literature of interest to midwives.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011 Nov-Dec;56(6):649-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00127_4.x. Epub 2011 Oct 21. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011. PMID: 22060229 No abstract available.

References

    1. Powers JH. Practice guidelines: belief, criticism, and probability. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:15–7.
    1. Sniderman AD, Furberg CD. Why guideline-making requires reform. JAMA 2009;301:429–31.
    1. Burgers JS, Bailey JV, Klazinga NS, Van Der Bij AK, Grol R, Feder G. Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1933–9.
    1. Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA 2009;301:868–9.
    1. Matthys J, De Meyere M, van Driel ML, De Sutter A. Differences among international pharyngitis guidelines: not just academic. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:436–43.

LinkOut - more resources