Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;6(8):e22853.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022853. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

Juvenile greylag geese (Anser anser) discriminate between individual siblings

Affiliations

Juvenile greylag geese (Anser anser) discriminate between individual siblings

Isabella B R Scheiber et al. PLoS One. 2011.

Abstract

Social species that maintain individualised relationships with certain others despite continuous changes in age, reproductive status and dominance rank between group members ought to be capable of individual recognition. Tests of "true" individual recognition, where an individual recognises unique features of another, are rare, however. Often kinship and/or familiarity suffice to explain dyadic interactions. The complex relationships within a greylag goose flock suggest that they should be able to recognise individuals irrespective of familiarity or kinship. We tested whether six-week-old hand-raised greylags can discriminate between two of their siblings. We developed a new experimental protocol, in which geese were trained to associate social siblings with geometrical symbols. Subsequently, focals were presented with two geometrical symbols in the presence of a sibling associated with one of the symbols. Significant choice of the geometrical symbol associated with the target present indicated that focals were able to distinguish between individual targets. Greylag goslings successfully learned this association-discrimination task, regardless of genetic relatedness or sex of the sibling targets. Social relationships within a goose flock thus may indeed be based on recognition of unique features of individual conspecifics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Percentage of correct and wrong choices of all 15 focal individuals on the penultimate and ultimate day of the recognition task.
81.25% and above marks a performance above chance (dotted line). Asterisks mark significant differences: p<0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Percentage of correct choices of family groups A, B, and C on the penultimate and ultimate day of the recognition task.

References

    1. Hinde R. Primate Social Relationships - An Integrated Approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Press; 1983. 384
    1. Rendall D, Rodman PS, Emond RE. Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Anim Behav. 1996;51:1007–1015.
    1. Hamilton WD. The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am Nat. 1963;97:354–356.
    1. Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behavior I. J Theor Biol. 1964a;7:1–16. - PubMed
    1. Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behavior II. J Theor Biol. 1964b;7:17–52. - PubMed

Publication types