Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Aug 9:12:191.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-191.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of sublingual immunotherapy in natural rubber latex allergic patients

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of sublingual immunotherapy in natural rubber latex allergic patients

Gabriel Gastaminza et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Natural rubber latex allergy is a common and unsolved health problem. Since the avoidance of exposure is very difficult, immunotherapy is strongly recommended, but before its use in patients, it is essential to prove the efficacy and safety of extracts.The aim of the present randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of latex sublingual immunotherapy in adult patients undergoing permanent latex avoidance.

Methods: Twenty-eight adult latex-allergic patients (5 males and 23 females), with mean age of 39 years (range 24-57) were randomized to receive a commercial latex-sublingual immunotherapy or placebo during one year, followed by another year of open, active therapy. The following outcomes were measured at baseline and at the end of first and second year of follow-up: skin prick test, gloves-use score, conjunctival challenge test, total and specific IgE, basophil activation test, and adverse reactions monitoring.

Results: No significant difference in any of the efficacy in vivo variables was observed between active and placebo groups at the end of the placebo-controlled phase, nor when each group was compared with their baseline values at the end of the two year-study. An improvement in the average percentage of basophils activated was observed. During the induction phase, 4 reactions in the active group and 5 in the placebo group were recorded. During the maintenance phase, two patients dropped out due to pruritus and to acute dermatitis respectively.

Conclusion: Further studies are needed to evaluate latex-sublingual immunotherapy, since efficacy could not be demonstrated in adult patients with avoidance of the allergen.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12611000543987.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Allocation of patients to treatment group and study phases.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results of Cutaneous Tolerance Index (CTI) in Active and Placebo groups during the two years of study.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A. Mean IgE-k82 (black square), IgE-rHev b 5 (black circle), and IgE rHev b 6 (black triangle), during the 2-years follow-up, in active group; B. Mean IgE-k82 (black square), IgE-rHev b 5 (black circle), and IgE rHev b 6 (black triangle), during the 2-years follow-up, in placebo group.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Short-, Intermediate-, and Long-Term Changes in Basophil Reactivity Induced by Venom Immunotherapy.
    Rodríguez Trabado A, Cámara Hijón C, Ramos Cantariño A, Romero-Chala S, García-Trujillo JA, Fernández Pereira LM. Rodríguez Trabado A, et al. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2016 Sep;8(5):412-20. doi: 10.4168/aair.2016.8.5.412. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2016. PMID: 27334779 Free PMC article.
  • Sublingual immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization position paper 2013 update.
    Canonica GW, Cox L, Pawankar R, Baena-Cagnani CE, Blaiss M, Bonini S, Bousquet J, Calderón M, Compalati E, Durham SR, van Wijk RG, Larenas-Linnemann D, Nelson H, Passalacqua G, Pfaar O, Rosário N, Ryan D, Rosenwasser L, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Senna G, Valovirta E, Van Bever H, Vichyanond P, Wahn U, Yusuf O. Canonica GW, et al. World Allergy Organ J. 2014 Mar 28;7(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1939-4551-7-6. World Allergy Organ J. 2014. PMID: 24679069 Free PMC article.
  • Latex Allergy: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
    Nucera E, Aruanno A, Rizzi A, Centrone M. Nucera E, et al. J Asthma Allergy. 2020 Sep 28;13:385-398. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S242058. eCollection 2020. J Asthma Allergy. 2020. PMID: 33061465 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Latex Allergy in Children.
    Arasi S, Barni S, Caminiti L, Castagnoli R, Giovannini M, Liotti L, Mastrorilli C, Mori F, Pecoraro L, Saretta F, Gelsomino M, Klain A, Miraglia Del Giudice M, Novembre E. Arasi S, et al. J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 25;13(1):124. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010124. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38202131 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Latex immunotherapy: evidence of effectiveness.
    Nucera E, Mezzacappa S, Buonomo A, Centrone M, Rizzi A, Manicone PF, Patriarca G, Aruanno A, Schiavino D. Nucera E, et al. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018 Apr;35(2):145-150. doi: 10.5114/ada.2018.75235. Epub 2018 Apr 24. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2018. PMID: 29760613 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Nutter AF. Contact urticaria to rubber. Br J Dermatol. 1979;101(5):597–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1979.tb11893.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Forstrom L. Contact urticaria from latex surgical gloves. Contact Dermatitis. 1980;6(1):33–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1980.tb03887.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carrillo T, Blanco C, Quiralte J, Castillo R, Cuevas M, Rodriguez de Castro F. Prevalence of latex allergy among greenhouse workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995;96(5 Pt 1):699–701. - PubMed
    1. Rolland JM, O'Hehir RE. Latex allergy: a model for therapy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38(6):898–912. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02984.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allmers H, Schmengler J, John SM. Decreasing incidence of occupational contact urticaria caused by natural rubber latex allergy in German health care workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114(2):347–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.05.054. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms