A spatial scan statistic for multiple clusters
- PMID: 21827771
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.07.004
A spatial scan statistic for multiple clusters
Abstract
Spatial scan statistics are commonly used for geographical disease surveillance and cluster detection. While there are multiple clusters coexisting in the study area, they become difficult to detect because of clusters' shadowing effect to each other. The recently proposed sequential method showed its better power for detecting the second weaker cluster, but did not improve the ability of detecting the first stronger cluster which is more important than the second one. We propose a new extension of the spatial scan statistic which could be used to detect multiple clusters. Through constructing two or more clusters in the alternative hypothesis, our proposed method accounts for other coexisting clusters in the detecting and evaluating process. The performance of the proposed method is compared to the sequential method through an intensive simulation study, in which our proposed method shows better power in terms of both rejecting the null hypothesis and accurately detecting the coexisting clusters. In the real study of hand-foot-mouth disease data in Pingdu city, a true cluster town is successfully detected by our proposed method, which cannot be evaluated to be statistically significant by the standard method due to another cluster's shadowing effect.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A spatial scan statistic for nonisotropic two-level risk cluster.Stat Med. 2012 Jan 30;31(2):177-87. doi: 10.1002/sim.4341. Epub 2011 Aug 18. Stat Med. 2012. PMID: 21850654
-
Fast detection of arbitrarily shaped disease clusters.Stat Med. 2006 Mar 15;25(5):723-42. doi: 10.1002/sim.2411. Stat Med. 2006. PMID: 16453376
-
An extended power of cluster detection tests.Stat Med. 2006 Mar 15;25(5):841-52. doi: 10.1002/sim.2419. Stat Med. 2006. PMID: 16453379
-
Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):329-45. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200710423. Biom J. 2008. PMID: 18537126 Review.
-
Adaptations for finding irregularly shaped disease clusters.Int J Health Geogr. 2007 Jul 5;6:28. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-6-28. Int J Health Geogr. 2007. PMID: 17615077 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Selection of the Maximum Spatial Cluster Size of the Spatial Scan Statistic by Using the Maximum Clustering Set-Proportion Statistic.PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147918. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26820646 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial distribution and associated factors of dropout from health facility delivery after antenatal booking in Ethiopia: a multi-level analysis.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Feb 23;23(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02229-y. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 36823622 Free PMC article.
-
A scan statistic for binary outcome based on hypergeometric probability model, with an application to detecting spatial clusters of Japanese encephalitis.PLoS One. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e65419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065419. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23785424 Free PMC article.
-
Stepwise and stagewise approaches for spatial cluster detection.Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2016 May;17:59-74. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 3. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 27246273 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial heterogeneity of type I error for local cluster detection tests.Int J Health Geogr. 2014 May 27;13:15. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-15. Int J Health Geogr. 2014. PMID: 24885343 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources