Cardiac imaging: does radiation matter?
- PMID: 21828062
- PMCID: PMC3291500
- DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr281
Cardiac imaging: does radiation matter?
Abstract
The use of ionizing radiation in cardiovascular imaging has generated considerable discussion. Radiation should not be considered in isolation, but rather in the context of a careful examination of the benefits, risks, and costs of cardiovascular imaging. Such consideration requires an understanding of some fundamental aspects of the biology, physics, epidemiology, and terminology germane to radiation, as well as principles of radiological protection. This paper offers a concise, contemporary perspective on these areas by addressing pertinent questions relating to radiation and its application to cardiac imaging.
References
-
- Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:362–378. - PubMed
-
- National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Bethesda, MD: 2009. Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States.
-
- Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology. 2010;254:326–341. - PubMed
-
- Bogdanich W. New York Times; 2011. Radiation overdoses despite FDA warnings. March 5.
-
- The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37:1–332. - PubMed
