Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 6;105(6):753-9.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.308. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study

J Prades  1 , J A Espinàs, R Font, J M Argimon, J M Borràs
Affiliations

Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study

J Prades et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The Cancer Fast-track Programme's aim was to reduce the time that elapsed between well-founded suspicion of breast, colorectal and lung cancer and the start of initial treatment in Catalonia (Spain). We sought to analyse its implementation and overall effectiveness.

Methods: A quantitative analysis of the programme was performed using data generated by the hospitals on the basis of seven fast-track monitoring indicators for the period 2006-2009. In addition, we conducted a qualitative study, based on 83 semistructured interviews with primary and specialised health professionals and health administrators, to obtain their perception of the programme's implementation.

Results: About half of all new patients with breast, lung or colorectal cancer were diagnosed via the fast track, though the cancer detection rate declined across the period. Mean time from detection of suspected cancer in primary care to start of initial treatment was 32 days for breast, 30 for colorectal and 37 for lung cancer (2009). Professionals associated with the implementation of the programme showed that general practitioners faced with suspicion of cancer had changed their conduct with the aim of preventing lags. Furthermore, hospitals were found to have pursued three specific implementation strategies (top-down, consensus-based and participatory), which made for the cohesion and sustainability of the circuits.

Conclusion: The programme has contributed to speeding up diagnostic assessment and treatment of patients with suspicion of cancer, and to clarifying the patient pathway between primary and specialised care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scope and functions of the CFP.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Waiting times in breast, lung and colorectal cancer (2006–2009).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Barton MB, Morley DS, Moore S, Allen JD, Kleinman KP, Emmons KM, Fletcher SW (2004) Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial. JNCI Cancer Spectrum 96(7): 529–538 - PubMed
    1. Borràs J, Ameijide A, Vilardell L, Valls J, Marcos-Gragera R, Izquierdo A (2008) Evolución de la incidencia del cáncer en Cataluña: 1985–2002. Med Clin (Barc) 131(S1): 11–18 - PubMed
    1. Borràs JM, Colomer C, Soria P, López R (2010) Priorities for cancer control in Spain. Ann Oncol 21(S3): iii111–iii114 - PubMed
    1. Brett J, Bankhead C, Henderson B, Watson E, Austoker J (2005) The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review. Psychooncology 14(11): 917–938 - PubMed
    1. Bryman A, Burgess R (1993) Analysing Qualitative Data. Routledge: London

Publication types