Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;6(7):e23017.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023017. Epub 2011 Jul 28.

Testing for spatial neglect with line bisection and target cancellation: are both tasks really unrelated?

Affiliations

Testing for spatial neglect with line bisection and target cancellation: are both tasks really unrelated?

Pascal Molenberghs et al. PLoS One. 2011.

Abstract

Damage to the parietal lobe can induce a condition known as spatial neglect, characterized by a lack of awareness of the personal and/or extrapersonal space opposite the damaged brain region. Spatial neglect is commonly assessed clinically using either the line bisection or the target cancellation task. However, it is unclear whether poor performance on each of these two tasks is associated with the same or different lesion locations. To date, methodological limitations and differences have prevented a definitive link between task performance and lesion location to be made. Here we report findings from a voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM) analysis of an unbiased selection of 44 patients with a recent unifocal stroke. Patients performed both the line bisection and target cancellation task. For each of the two tasks a continuous score was incorporated into the VLSM analysis. Both tasks correlated highly with each other (r = .76) and VLSM analyses indicated that the angular gyrus was the critical lesion site for both tasks. The results suggest that both tasks probe the same underlying cortical deficits and although the cancellation task was more sensitive than the line bisection task, both can be used in a clinical setting to test for spatial neglect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Lesion distribution volume map for all subjects (n = 44).
The color code indicates in how many individuals a given voxel was lesioned (ranging from 1 to 13).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Lesion-symptom maps for all subjects (n = 44) showing results for the target cancellation task (neglect score 1, A), and the line bisection task (neglect score 2, B).
With both tasks, the posterior medial part of the angular gyrus (red areas) was associated with significant deficits. The input threshold for the cancellation task was set at FDR<0.01, and for the line bisection task it was set at FDR <0.05.

References

    1. Heilman K, Watson R, Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman K, Valenstein E, editors. Clinical Neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. pp. 279–336.
    1. Gauthier L, Dehaut F, Joanette Y. The Bells Test - A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology. 1989;11:49–54.
    1. Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology. 1980;30:509–517. - PubMed
    1. Azouvi P, Samuel C, Louis-Dreyfus A, Bernati T, Bartolomeo P, et al. Sensitivity of clinical and behavioural tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 2002;73:160–166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Wade DT. Visuospatial neglect - Underlying factors and test sensitivity. Lancet. 1989;2:908–911. - PubMed

Publication types