Comparison of microcoaxial with standard clear corneal incisions in torsional handpiece cataract surgery
- PMID: 21832823
- DOI: 10.1159/000329599
Comparison of microcoaxial with standard clear corneal incisions in torsional handpiece cataract surgery
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the effect of torsional handpiece incision size on phacodynamics and endothelial cell loss (ECL) in cataract surgery.
Design: Prospective, observer-masked study at the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Participants: This study was conducted on 60 eyes of 60 patients who underwent phacoemulsification.
Methods: Cataract surgery was performed on 28 eyes using a 0.9-mm micro 45-degree Kelman ABS (aspiration bypass system) tip through a 2.8-mm standard incision, and on 32 eyes using a 0.9-mm mini-flared 45-degree Kelman ABS tip through a 2.2-mm microcoaxial incision. As main outcome measures, intraoperative phacodynamics (cumulative dissipated energy, CDE, and balanced salt solution, BSS, use), central corneal thickness (CCT) and endothelial cell count (ECC) were investigated.
Results: The CDE was lower in the microcoaxial incision (2.2-mm) group than in the standard incision (2.8-mm) group (p = 0.038). The ECC loss at 6 months was significantly lower in the microcoaxial incision group than in the standard incision group (p = 0.048). There were no differences in BSS use or CCT between the two groups.
Conclusions: Torsional ultrasound phacoemulsification using microcoaxial incision with a mini-flared tip resulted in less energy use and less ECL compared with standard incision with a micro tip.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 May;35(5):874-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.031. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009. PMID: 19393887 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of a torsional handpiece through microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract wounds.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Dec;34(12):2091-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.025. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008. PMID: 19027565
-
Comparison of tips in coaxial microincision cataract surgery with the bevel-down technique.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Nov;37(11):2028-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.038. Epub 2011 Sep 9. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011. PMID: 21907535 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of efficacy between coaxial microincision and standard-incision phacoemulsification in patients with age-related cataracts: a meta-analysis.BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0661-6. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 29284444 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Charles Kelman: The Father of Phacoemulsification.Cureus. 2024 Jun 5;16(6):e61727. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61727. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38975537 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of pre-fragmentation on efficacy and safety for phacoemulsification in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: a non-randomized clinical trial.Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jan 15;11(1):5. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1279. Epub 2022 Dec 13. Ann Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 36760257 Free PMC article.
-
Different-sized incisions for phacoemulsification in age-related cataract.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 20;9(9):CD010510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010510.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28931202 Free PMC article.
-
Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery versus Standard Coaxial Small-Incision Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.PLoS One. 2016 Jan 8;11(1):e0146676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146676. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26745279 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative analysis of corneal morphological changes after transversal and torsional phacoemulsification through 2.2 mm corneal incision.Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:55-61. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S39019. Epub 2013 Jan 8. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 23326184 Free PMC article.
-
Customized Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Adult Cataract in Iran.J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2015 Oct-Dec;10(4):445-60. doi: 10.4103/2008-322X.176913. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2015. PMID: 27051491 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials