Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;42(2):67-82.
doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2011.00267.x.

What works in family planning interventions: a systematic review

Affiliations

What works in family planning interventions: a systematic review

Lisa Mwaikambo et al. Stud Fam Plann. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

This study presents findings from a systematic review of evaluations of family planning interventions published between 1995 and 2008. Studies that used an experimental or quasi-experimental design or used another approach to attribute program exposure to observed changes in fertility or family planning outcomes at the individual or population levels were included and ranked by strength of evidence. A total of 63 studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings from this review are summarized in tabular format by the type of intervention (classified as supply-side or demand-side). About two-thirds of the studies found were evaluations of programs focusing on demand generation. Findings from all programs revealed significant improvements in knowledge, attitudes, discussion, and intentions. Program impacts on use of contraceptives and use of family planning services were less consistently found, and fewer than half of the studies that measured fertility or pregnancy-related outcomes found an impact. Based on the review findings, we identify promising programmatic approaches and propose directions for future evaluation research of family planning interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agha S. A Quasi-Experimental Study to Assess the Impact of Four Adolescent Sexual Health Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2002;28(2):67–118.
    1. Agha S, Van Rossem R. Impact of a school-based peer sexual health intervention on normative beliefs, risk perceptions, and sexual behavior of Zambian adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2004;34(5):441–452. - PubMed
    1. Agha S, Karim AM, Balal A, Sosler S. The impact of a reproductive health franchise on client satisfaction in rural Nepal. Health Policy and Planning. 2007;22:320–328. - PubMed
    1. Allen R. The role of family planning in poverty reduction. Obstetrics and Gynecology-New York. 2007;110(5):999. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong R, Waters E, Doyle J, editors. Chapter 21: Reviews in health promotion and public health.
    2. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008. [updated September 2008], Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.

Publication types

MeSH terms