Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov 1;39(20):e135.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr620. Epub 2011 Aug 10.

ParaDock: a flexible non-specific DNA--rigid protein docking algorithm

Affiliations

ParaDock: a flexible non-specific DNA--rigid protein docking algorithm

Itamar Banitt et al. Nucleic Acids Res. .

Abstract

Accurate prediction of protein-DNA complexes could provide an important stepping stone towards a thorough comprehension of vital intracellular processes. Few attempts were made to tackle this issue, focusing on binding patch prediction, protein function classification and distance constraints-based docking. We introduce ParaDock: a novel ab initio protein-DNA docking algorithm. ParaDock combines short DNA fragments, which have been rigidly docked to the protein based on geometric complementarity, to create bent planar DNA molecules of arbitrary sequence. Our algorithm was tested on the bound and unbound targets of a protein-DNA benchmark comprised of 47 complexes. With neither addressing protein flexibility, nor applying any refinement procedure, CAPRI acceptable solutions were obtained among the 10 top ranked hypotheses in 83% of the bound complexes, and 70% of the unbound. Without requiring prior knowledge of DNA length and sequence, and within <2 h per target on a standard 2.0 GHz single processor CPU, ParaDock offers a fast ab initio docking solution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Various conformational changes undergone by DNA molecules when bound to proteins: (a) base flipping (1EMH); (b) helix unwinding (1EYU); (c) bending (1O3T); (d) A-form helix (1QRV).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Illustration of the ParaDock algorithm. Illustrations are genuine figures from the 1O3T test run.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Illustration of best result complexes within the top 10 ranking in four targets. Proteins are shown in blue (differences between bound and unbound versions can be observed), native solution in red, ParaDock solution in green. Trimmed curve (DNA central axis) is colored black.

References

    1. Ohlendorf DH, Matthew JB. Electrostatics and flexibility in protein–DNA interactions. Advan. Biophys. 1985;20:137–151. - PubMed
    1. Nadassy K, Wodak SJ, Janin J. Structural features of protein−nucleic acid recognition sites. Biochemistry. 1999;38:1999–2017. - PubMed
    1. Mandel-Gutfreund Y, Margalit H, Jernigan RL, Zhurkin VB. A role for CH … O interactions in protein–DNA recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 1998;277:1140–1129. - PubMed
    1. Wade RC, Gabdoulline RR, Lu'demann SK, Lounnas V. Electrostatic steering and ionic tethering in enzyme–ligand binding: Insights from simulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:5942–5949. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luscombe MN, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. Amino acid-base interactions: a three-dimensional analysis of protein-DNA interactions at an atomic level. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;21:2860–2874. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types