Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S27-36.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300109. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

Disproportionate proximity to environmental health hazards: methods, models, and measurement

Jayajit Chakraborty  1 , Juliana A Maantay, Jean D Brender
Affiliations
Review

Disproportionate proximity to environmental health hazards: methods, models, and measurement

Jayajit Chakraborty et al. Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

We sought to provide a historical overview of methods, models, and data used in the environmental justice (EJ) research literature to measure proximity to environmental hazards and potential exposure to their adverse health effects. We explored how the assessment of disproportionate proximity and exposure has evolved from comparing the prevalence of minority or low-income residents in geographic entities hosting pollution sources and discrete buffer zones to more refined techniques that use continuous distances, pollutant fate-and-transport models, and estimates of health risk from toxic exposure. We also reviewed analytical techniques used to determine the characteristics of people residing in areas potentially exposed to environmental hazards and emerging geostatistical techniques that are more appropriate for EJ analysis than conventional statistical methods. We concluded by providing several recommendations regarding future research and data needs for EJ assessment that would lead to more reliable results and policy solutions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Spatial definition of proximity to environmental hazards using (a) spatial coincidence to select host census units, (b) circular buffers of uniform radius around facilities of concern, and (c) plume footprint for a hypothetical chlorine release scenario using the Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres model.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Spatial definition of proximity to environmental hazards using (a) spatial coincidence to select host census units, (b) circular buffers of uniform radius around facilities of concern, and (c) plume footprint for a hypothetical chlorine release scenario using the Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres model.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Spatial definition of proximity to environmental hazards using (a) spatial coincidence to select host census units, (b) circular buffers of uniform radius around facilities of concern, and (c) plume footprint for a hypothetical chlorine release scenario using the Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres model.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Use of areal interpolation to select census units within a circular buffer using (a) polygon containment, (b) centroid containment, and (c) buffer containment.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Use of areal interpolation to select census units within a circular buffer using (a) polygon containment, (b) centroid containment, and (c) buffer containment.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Use of areal interpolation to select census units within a circular buffer using (a) polygon containment, (b) centroid containment, and (c) buffer containment.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Cadastral dasymetric mapping: using land parcels to estimate households within a circular buffer zone.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Using geographically weighted regression to explore the relationship between cancer risk from non–point (area) sources of air toxics (1999 National-Scale Air Toxic Assessment) and various explanatory variables (2000 Census) in Florida: Distribution of local t statistic by census tract.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Using geographically weighted regression to explore the relationship between cancer risk from non–point (area) sources of air toxics (1999 National-Scale Air Toxic Assessment) and various explanatory variables (2000 Census) in Florida: Distribution of local t statistic by census tract.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Using geographically weighted regression to explore the relationship between cancer risk from non–point (area) sources of air toxics (1999 National-Scale Air Toxic Assessment) and various explanatory variables (2000 Census) in Florida: Distribution of local t statistic by census tract.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Using geographically weighted regression to explore the relationship between cancer risk from non–point (area) sources of air toxics (1999 National-Scale Air Toxic Assessment) and various explanatory variables (2000 Census) in Florida: Distribution of local t statistic by census tract.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boer JT, Pastor M, Sadd JL, Snyder LD. Is there environmental racism? the demographics of hazardous waste in Los Angeles. Soc Sci Q. 1997;78(4):793–810
    1. Bowen WM, Salling MJ, Haynes KE, Cyran EJ. Towards environmental justice: spatial equity in Ohio and Cleveland. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 1995;85(4):641–663
    1. Burke LM. Environmental Equity in Los Angeles. NCGIA technical report 93-6 Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis; 1993
    1. Chakraborty J, Armstrong MP. Exploring the use of buffer analysis for the identification of impacted areas in environmental equity assessment. Cartography Geographic Inf Sci. 1997;24:145–157
    1. Chakraborty J, Schweitzer L, Forkenbrock D. Using GIS to assess the environmental justice consequences of transportation system changes. Trans GIS. 1999;3(3):239–258

Publication types

Substances