Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Sep;31(6):697-704.
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318221ebce.

"4-in-1 osteosynthesis" for atrophic-type congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

"4-in-1 osteosynthesis" for atrophic-type congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia

In Ho Choi et al. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Background: According to the authors' multi-targeted, fibular status-based algorithmic approach using the Ilizarov technique, ankle stabilization by end-to-end osteosynthesis of the fibula is advocated for mild (type B1), "4-in-1 osteosynthesis" in which all 4 proximal and distal segments of the tibia and fibula are placed in 1 healing mass for moderate (type B2), and distal tibiofibular (TF) fusion for severe (type B3) fibular pseudarthrosis in association with atrophic-type congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT). This report describes the indications, operative technique, and outcomes of "4-in-1 osteosynthesis" for atrophic-type CPT associated with type B2 fibular pseudarthrosis.

Methods: Thirteen patients presented with atrophic-type CPT associated with type B2 fibular pseudarthrosis underwent Ilizarov osteosynthesis between 1989 and 2007 for atrophic-type CPT. To validate the efficacy of "4-in-1 osteosynthesis" in these patients, fracture risk and ankle function were compared between 2 groups of type B2 patients, namely, 8 patients (mean age, 6.3 y) who underwent "4-in-1 osteosynthesis" according to our current protocol (Group I), and 5 patients (mean age, 3.2 y) treated by other techniques (3 distal TF fusion, 2 failed end-to-end osteosynthesis) during the learning period (Group II).

Results: No refracture occurred in Group I, whereas refracture occurred in all except 1 in Group II. Ankles were eventually stabilized by distal TF fusion in all patients in Group II. The Kaplan-Meier method revealed a refracture-free cumulative survival rate of 100% in Group I, whereas in Group II, it dropped progressively and reached 60% at 1.8 years and 20% at 2.7 years. No significant difference in ankle function was evident between the 2 groups (american orthopaedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) score, 89.25 ± 7.25 after 7.4 y of follow-up in Group I, and 84.6 ± 9.53 after 13 y of follow-up in Group II).

Conclusions: It is imperative that fibular status be evaluated carefully to enable the planning of the most effective, safe, practical treatment. "4-in-1 osteosynthesis," which is primarily considered for bony union with a large cross-sectional area and ankle stabilization, seems to be a better choice for atrophic-type CPT associated with type B2 fibular pseudarthrosis, in which end-to-end osteosynthesis of the fibula often fails.

Level of evidence: Level III, Retrospective comparative study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources