Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;22(1):181-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2240-1. Epub 2011 Aug 14.

Radiofrequency ablation for non-spinal osteoid osteomas in 557 patients

Affiliations

Radiofrequency ablation for non-spinal osteoid osteomas in 557 patients

Eugenio Rimondi et al. Eur Radiol. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To present the results of biopsy and computed tomography (CT) guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for non-spinal osteoid osteomas, and compare the results before and after procedural modifications.

Methods: We retrospectively studied 557 patients with non-spinal osteoid osteomas treated with biopsy and CT-guided RFA. In 68 patients we used 3-mm CT at 2-mm intervals, 19 G/5-mm active tip electrodes, and one 4-minute ablation at 90-93°C. In 489 patients we used contiguous 1-mm CT, 20 G/5-15-mm electrodes, ablation maintaining 60°C for 2 min followed by 14-15 min at 90-93°C, and multiple ablations in the same session for large and multiform lesions.

Results: 533/557 patients (96%) remained asymptomatic and 24/557 (4%) had recurrence; repeat RFA was successful in 22/24 patients (92%). Biopsy was non-diagnostic in 82%. With the modifications performed, success improved from 79% to 98%, recurrences reduced from 21% to 2% and complications from 5.9% to 0.2% (p < 0.001). All patients with large and multiform lesions treated with one ablation had recurrence, compared to no patient with similar lesions and multiple ablations in the same session.

Conclusion: Electrode parameters, duration of ablation, morphology and size of osteoid osteomas are important for RFA. The above modifications are recommended for improved outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Feb;74(2):179-85 - PubMed
    1. Acad Radiol. 1996 Mar;3(3):212-8 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Apr;(373):115-24 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Dec;179(6):1633-42 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2004 Apr;14(4):607-17 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms