Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Aug 15:11:63.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-63.

The influence of a series of five dry cupping treatments on pain and mechanical thresholds in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain--a randomised controlled pilot study

Romy Lauche  1 , Holger Cramer, Kyung-Eun Choi, Thomas Rampp, Felix Joyonto Saha, Gustav J Dobos, Frauke Musial
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The influence of a series of five dry cupping treatments on pain and mechanical thresholds in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain--a randomised controlled pilot study

Romy Lauche et al. BMC Complement Altern Med. .

Abstract

Background: In this preliminary trial we investigated the effects of dry cupping, an ancient method for treating pain syndromes, on patients with chronic non-specific neck pain. Sensory mechanical thresholds and the participants' self-reported outcome measures of pain and quality of life were evaluated.

Methods: Fifty patients (50.5 ± 11.9 years) were randomised to a treatment group (TG) or a waiting-list control group (WL). Patients in the TG received a series of 5 cupping treatments over a period of 2 weeks; the control group did not. Self-reported outcome measures before and after the cupping series included the following: Pain at rest (PR) and maximal pain related to movement (PM) on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), pain diary (PD) data on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and health-related quality of life (SF-36). In addition, the mechanical-detection thresholds (MDT), vibration-detection thresholds (VDT), and pressure-pain thresholds (PPT) were determined at pain-related and control areas.

Results: Patients of the TG had significantly less pain after cupping therapy than patients of the WL group (PR: Δ-22.5 mm, p = 0.00002; PM: Δ-17.8 mm, p = 0.01). Pain diaries (PD) revealed that neck pain decreased gradually in the TG patients and that pain reported by the two groups differed significantly after the fifth cupping session (Δ-1.1, p = 0.001). There were also significant differences in the SF-36 subscales for bodily pain (Δ13.8, p = 0.006) and vitality (Δ10.2, p = 0.006). Group differences in PPT were significant at pain-related and control areas (all p < 0.05), but were not significant for MDT or VDT.

Conclusions: A series of five dry cupping treatments appeared to be effective in relieving chronic non-specific neck pain. Not only subjective measures improved, but also mechanical pain sensitivity differed significantly between the two groups, suggesting that cupping has an influence on functional pain processing.

Trial registration: The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01289964).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consort flow chart of recruitment and trial conditions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pain ratings decrease in the treatment group (pain diary, NRS, Mean ± SEM). Pain ratings of the TG were averaged between two cupping sessions. For the WL group we divided the number of days between T1 and T2 by the number of treatments in the TG. This resulted in pain ratings averaged every 3.5 days.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Course of pressure-pain thresholds over time (a) and differences in pressure-pain thresholds (T2-T1) (b) at pain-related and control areas (Mean ± SEM). Please note: Raw data instead of log-transformed data were used for illustration purposes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(6):834–848. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Binder A. The diagnosis and treatment of nonspecific neck pain and whiplash. Eura Medicophys. 2007;43(1):79–89. - PubMed
    1. Schoffermann JA, Koestler ME. In: Handbook of Complex Occupational Disability Claims: Early Risk Identification, Intervention and Prevention. Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, editor. New York: Springer; 2005. Whiplash and neck pain-related disability; pp. 203–216.
    1. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of Chronic Pain: Description Of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. 2. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994.
    1. Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Cassidy JD, Guzman J, Cote P, Haldeman S, Ammendolia C, Carragee E, Hurwitz E, Nordin M, Peloso P. The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32(2 Suppl):S46–60. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data