[Check up 35: what benefits do general practitioners in Brandenburg see?]
- PMID: 21843844
- DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.07.012
[Check up 35: what benefits do general practitioners in Brandenburg see?]
Abstract
Introduction: The so-called "Check up 35" is a structured preventive examination to be conducted by primary care providers. Recent interviews have shown that expectations with regard to this examination vary among physicians; some of them expressed doubt that the consultation is useful at all. The aim of this study was to representatively examine Brandenburg's family physicians' attitudes towards this "Check up".
Methods: 50% of the family physicians listed in the data base of the Association of SHI Physicians were randomly selected to receive a mail questionnaire (n=748). Participation in the study was voluntary, the questionnaires were evaluated anonymously. The physicians were asked about both content and assumed benefit of consultations.
Results: The questionnaire was answered by 37% of the physicians (n=274). In 2008, 40 "Check ups" were conducted every three months. 96% of the physicians amended the standard programme with additional preventive examinations - most frequently serum creatinine measurements. In most of the respectively rated categories, they appreciate the usefulness of the examination. In contrast, they take a rather sceptical attitude towards the en bloc standard programme.
Discussion: The study shows that many family physicians are very critical of the "Check up 35"; in particular, this applies to the range of scheduled examinations. There are considerable variations in the individual shaping of the consultation process among the physicians. They use the "Check up" as a tool for individual prevention instead of limiting it to the reduced standardised screening as intended.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier GmbH.
Similar articles
-
[Cardiovascular prevention at the general practitioner? First results of a study on attitudes, services, success and barriers in practice].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012 Jan;137(1-2):17-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1292884. Epub 2011 Dec 16. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012. PMID: 22180278 German.
-
[Preventive advice-giving: self-assessment of general practitioners in Brandenburg].Gesundheitswesen. 2013 Aug;75(8-9):515-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1321784. Epub 2012 Aug 10. Gesundheitswesen. 2013. PMID: 22886337 German.
-
[Significance of social medicine in the medical contract office].Gesundheitswesen. 1998 Feb;60(2):80-6. Gesundheitswesen. 1998. PMID: 9553307 German.
-
[Check-up-examinations in internal medicine].Internist (Berl). 2006 Jan;47(1):55-65, quiz 66-7. doi: 10.1007/s00108-005-1536-0. Internist (Berl). 2006. PMID: 16365764 Review. German.
-
[Evidence based check-up: the general medical point of view].Praxis (Bern 1994). 2013 May 22;102(11):647-56. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a001291. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2013. PMID: 23692903 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40110911
-
General Practitioners' Views on Communication About Dietary Supplements During Periodic Health Examinations: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Germany.J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251333388. doi: 10.1177/21501319251333388. Epub 2025 May 8. J Prim Care Community Health. 2025. PMID: 40338895 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials