Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 27;366(1578):2591-7.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0111.

The key elements of a comprehensive global mammal conservation strategy

Affiliations

The key elements of a comprehensive global mammal conservation strategy

Carlo Rondinini et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

A global strategy is necessary to achieve the level of coordination, synergy and therefore optimization of resources to achieve the broad goal of conserving mammals worldwide. Key elements for the development of such a strategy include: an institutional subject that owns the strategy; broad conservation goals, quantitative targets derived from them and appropriate indicators; data on the distribution of species, their threats, the cost-effectiveness of conservation actions; and a set of methods for the identification of conservation priorities. Previous global mammal research investigated phylogeny, extinction risk, and the species and areas that should be regarded as global conservation priorities. This theme issue presents new key elements: an updated Red List Index, a new list of evolutionarily distinct and globally endangered species, new high-resolution mammal distribution models, a global connectivity analysis and scenarios of future mammal distribution based on climate and land-cover change. Area prioritization schemes account for mammalian phylogeny, governance and cost-benefit of measures to abate habitat loss. Three discussion papers lay the foundations for the development of a global unifying mammal conservation strategy, which should not be further deterred by the knowledge gaps still existing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Butchart S., et al. 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 1164–116810.1126/science.1187512 (doi:10.1126/science.1187512) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balmford A., Rodrigues A. S. L., Gaston K. J., James A. 2000. Integrating conservation costs into priority setting. Conserv. Biol. 11, 597–60510.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00000-i2.x (doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00000-i2.x) - DOI - DOI
    1. Brooks T. M., et al. 2006. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313, 58–6110.1126/science.1127609 (doi:10.1126/science.1127609) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson K., McBride M., Bode M., Possingham H. 2006. Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 440, 337–34010.1038/nature04366 (doi:10.1038/nature04366) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trimble M., Van Aarde R. 2010. Species inequality in scientific study. Conserv. Biol. 24, 886–89010.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01453.x (doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01453.x) - DOI - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources