Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;22(1):59-72.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2239-7. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

Indications, imaging technique, and reading of cardiac computed tomography: survey of clinical practice

Affiliations

Indications, imaging technique, and reading of cardiac computed tomography: survey of clinical practice

M H Maurer et al. Eur Radiol. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To obtain an overview of the current clinical practice of cardiac computed tomography (CT).

Methods: A 32-item questionnaire was mailed to a total of 750 providers of cardiac CT in 57 countries.

Results: A total of 169 questionnaires from 38 countries were available for analysis (23%). Most CT systems used (94%, 207/221) were of the latest generation (64-row or dual-source CT). The most common indications for cardiac CT was exclusion of coronary artery disease (97%, 164/169). Most centres used beta blockade (91%, 151/166) and sublingual nitroglycerine (80%, 134/168). A median slice thickness of 0.625 mm with a 0.5-mm increment and an 18-cm reconstruction field of view was used. Interpretation was most often done using source images in orthogonal planes (92%, 155/169). Ninety percent of sites routinely evaluate extracardiac structures on a large (70%) or cardiac field of view (20%). Radiology sites were significantly more interested in jointly performing cardiac CT together with cardiology than cardiologists. The mean examination time was 18.6 ± 8.4 min, and reading took on average 28.7 ± 17.8 min.

Conclusions: Cardiac CT has rapidly become established in clinical practice, and there is emerging consensus regarding indications, conduct of the acquisition, and reading.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Radiol. 2010 May;20(5):1168-73 - PubMed
    1. Acad Radiol. 2009 Feb;16(2):239-43 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Radiol. 2008 Dec;68(3):434-41 - PubMed
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999 May-Jun;23(3):474-84 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;58(1):103-5 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms