Advantages and disadvantages of mechanical vs. manual anastomosis in colorectal surgery. A prospective study
- PMID: 2184635
Advantages and disadvantages of mechanical vs. manual anastomosis in colorectal surgery. A prospective study
Abstract
The merits of mechanical versus manual anastomosis were evaluated in a prospective study of 48 patients undergoing resection of colonic or rectal cancer. The analyzed factors included the time required for construction of the anastomosis, the length of hospital stay, the cost/benefit ratio and complications. The anastomosis was manually performed with monolayer polyglactin 910 sutures in 24 cases and mechanically with an E.E.A. stapler in 24. The anastomosis time averaged 14 min in the suture group and 14.3 min in the stapling group, and the respective hospitalization times were 16 and 17 days. The mean cost was 48,000 lire in the manual, and 200,000 lire in the mechanical group. Four complications occurred in each group. Apart from the cost, no intergroup difference was statistically significant.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of stapled vs handsewn anastomosis in anterior resection for carcinoma rectum.Indian J Cancer. 1994 Jun;31(2):133-7. Indian J Cancer. 1994. PMID: 7927447 Clinical Trial.
-
[Manual and mechanic anastomosis. Comparison in oncologic surgery of the colon and rectum].Minerva Chir. 1990 Mar 15;45(5):237-40. Minerva Chir. 1990. PMID: 2198488 Italian.
-
Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study comparing handsewn vs. stapled anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Apr;48(4):729-34. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0829-z. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005. PMID: 15719189 Clinical Trial.
-
[Mechanical versus manual anastomoses in colorectal surgery. Personal experience].G Chir. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(11-12):505-10. G Chir. 2008. PMID: 19068189 Review. Italian.
-
Single and double stapled anastomoses in rectal cancer surgery; a retrospective study on the safety of the technique and its indication.Acta Chir Belg. 1996 Feb;96(1):31-6. Acta Chir Belg. 1996. PMID: 8629386 Review.
Cited by
-
Techniques for colorectal anastomosis.World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr 7;16(13):1610-21. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i13.1610. World J Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20355239 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Sao Paulo Med J. 2002 Sep 2;120(5):132-6. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802002000500002. Sao Paulo Med J. 2002. PMID: 12436148 Free PMC article.
-
Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD003144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003144.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22336786 Free PMC article.
-
Stapled vs. manually sutured bowel anastomosis in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.BMC Urol. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01763-1. BMC Urol. 2025. PMID: 40217220 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical