Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Sep:41 Suppl 2:534-48.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2163-7. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

Newer CT applications and their alternatives: what is appropriate in children?

Affiliations
Review

Newer CT applications and their alternatives: what is appropriate in children?

R Paul Guillerman. Pediatr Radiol. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Innovations in image acquisition and reconstruction technologies have greatly expanded the range of CT applications available in the routine clinical setting. CT images of sub-millimeter resolution can now be acquired of entire body regions in a few seconds or even sub-second time, allowing depiction of fine anatomical detail uncompromised by motion artifact. With sophisticated visualization software, image data can be processed into multiplanar, volume-rendered, cine and other formats to better display anatomical abnormalities and facilitate newer applications such as CT angiography, enterography, urography, tracheobronchography and cardiac CT. Newer applications including dual-energy material decomposition CT are furthering the transition of CT from a purely morphological to a combined anatomical, functional and metabolic imaging technique. These newer applications have largely been pioneered in adult populations, and heightened concern of the risk of carcinogenesis from ionizing radiation tempers dissemination of their use in children. Similar information can often be gleaned from alternative imaging modalities without ionizing radiation exposure, such as MRI and US, and what is most appropriate in children will depend on relative diagnostic efficacy, cost, availability and local expertise.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pediatr Radiol. 2010 Jun;40(6):1046-51 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Radiol. 2006 Nov;36(11):1119-32; quiz 1228-9 - PubMed
    1. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2010 Dec;24(6):1109-30 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov;18(11):2414-24 - PubMed
    1. Radiographics. 2008 May-Jun;28(3):e29 - PubMed

MeSH terms