Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Sep:41 Suppl 2:567-70.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2105-4. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

Getting it right: are regulation and registries for CT radiation dose in children the answer?

Affiliations
Review

Getting it right: are regulation and registries for CT radiation dose in children the answer?

Marilyn J Goske. Pediatr Radiol. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Recently, the state of California enacted a law requiring radiologists to record the radiation dose that each patient receives for a CT scan. Failure to do so is penalized by law. This law becomes effective in July 2012. By July 2013, every facility that performs CT scans must become accredited by one of three professional groups. This report discusses the role that legislation is playing in the practice of medicine in regard to CT practice. Inherent in this discussion is the assumption that pediatric radiologists know the right dose that a child should receive for a specific clinical indication. But do we really know the answer to this? Compared to the European radiology community, the United States radiology community lags in this regard. This paper defines diagnostic reference levels (DRL) and reviews the history of DRL in the United States compared to that in the European community and the progress by the American College of Radiology's National Radiology Data Registry (NRDR) to establish national registries. The establishment of the first pediatric Quality Improvement Registry in CT Scans in Children (QuIRCC) and its progress to date will be discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 May;4(5):272-84 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Feb;190(2):273-4 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Radiol. 2002 Apr;32(4):217-313 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 May;192(5):1169-75 - PubMed