Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;20(12):1775-83.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2251. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

A national study of out-of-pocket expenditures for mammography screening

Affiliations

A national study of out-of-pocket expenditures for mammography screening

Traci LeMasters et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify variations in screening mammography expenditures, primarily out-of-pocket and total expenditures, of women 40-64 years of age in the United States and factors associated with variations.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of data collected from the 2007 and 2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The sample included 2020 women 40-64 years of age who received one mammogram in 2007 or 2008. Ordinary least squares regression was used to describe relationships among out-of-pocket mammography expenditures, total mammography expenditures, and out-of-pocket mammography expenditures as a percentage of total mammography expenditures and such independent variables as insurance status and type, income, region of the United States, and type of facility where a mammogram was received.

Results: The average out-of-pocket expenditure for a mammogram in 2007 or 2008 was $33, representing 14.1% of the total mammogram expenditure ($266). After controlling for demographic and health factors, women who were uninsured, were from the Midwest, and had a mammogram at an office-based facility had greater out-of-pocket mammography expenditures. Women who were uninsured, lived in the South, and received their mammogram at an office-based facility had out-of-pocket mammography expenditures that represented a greater proportion of the total mammography expenditures.

Conclusions: Large variations in out-of-pocket expenditures were observed among women with and without insurance and between insurance types, geographic regions of the United States, and types of facilities where mammograms were received. A higher financial burden of mammography screening among some subgroups of women may act as a barrier to future mammography screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–723. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society. How many women get breast cancer? Overview: breast cancer. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2010. [Sep 7;2010 ].
    1. Nelson H. Tyne K. Naik A. Bougatos C. Chan B. Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: An update for the U.S. Preventive Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:727–737. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berry D. Cronin K. Plevritis S, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1784–1792. - PubMed
    1. Humphrey L. Helfand M. Chan B. Woolf S. Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:347–360. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms