Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2011 Sep;55(9):4492-3; author reply 4493.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00232-11.

Wild-type MIC distributions must be considered to set clinically meaningful susceptibility testing breakpoints for all bacterial pathogens, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Comment

Wild-type MIC distributions must be considered to set clinically meaningful susceptibility testing breakpoints for all bacterial pathogens, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Kristian Angeby et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Sep.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Wild-type MIC distributions of rifampin and isoniazid compared to current and suggested susceptibility testing breakpoints. Reproduced with permission from Oxford University Press (6). Wild-type MIC distributions were obtained on Middlebrook 7H10 medium using a replicator and compared to previous Bactec 460 susceptibility results (6). The bars with vertical lines represent the wild-type MIC distributions, and filled bars represent isolates that had previously been categorized as resistant. The current breakpoints and the breakpoints suggested by the authors (5) are indicated with arrows. Clearly, the suggested breakpoints would classify most of the wild-type strains (by definition lacking resistance mechanisms) as resistant and most of the corresponding patients as cases of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Also, the suggested breakpoints split the wild-type MIC distribution, which could lead to serious reproducibility problems. (a) Rifampin; (b) isoniazid.

Comment on

References

    1. Arendrup M. C., Kahlmeter G., Rodriguez-Tudela J. L., Donnelly J. P. 2009. Breakpoints for susceptibility testing should not divide wild-type distributions of important target species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:1628–1629 - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2011. Definitions of clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cutoff values. EUCAST, Växjö, Sweden: http://www.srga.org/Eucastwt/eucastdefinitions.htm
    1. Gumbo T., et al. 2007. Isoniazid bactericidal activity and resistance emergence: integrating pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenomics to predict efficacy in different ethnic populations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:2329–2336 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Larsson C., et al. 1999. High frequency of multi-drug resistant respiratory tract pathogens at community level in South India. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 5:740–744
    1. Pasipanodya J., Gumbo T. 2011. An oracle: antituberculosis pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics, clinical correlation, and clinical trial simulations to predict the future. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:24–34 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources