Individual, study, and neighborhood level characteristics associated with peer recruitment of young illicit drug users in New York City: optimizing respondent driven sampling
- PMID: 21852029
- PMCID: PMC3171638
- DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.040
Individual, study, and neighborhood level characteristics associated with peer recruitment of young illicit drug users in New York City: optimizing respondent driven sampling
Abstract
Recruiting a representative sample using respondent driven sampling (RDS) relies on successful peer recruitment. While prior studies have identified individual-level characteristics associated with peer recruitment, study- and neighborhood-level factors may also influence peer recruitment. This analysis aimed to identify individual-, study-, and neighborhood-level factors associated with RDS peer recruitment. 390 young adult (18-40 years) heroin, crack and/or cocaine users in New York City (NYC) were recruited via RDS into a cohort study aiming to identify social risk factors for transitioning from non-injection to injection drug use (2006-2009). Individual-level baseline characteristics (demographics, drug use, and network characteristics) and study factors (number of recruitment coupons received and participant attendance at RDS training sessions (RDST) on peer recruitment) were ascertained. Aggregate measures of neighborhood attitudes about drug use, drug users, and HIV were obtained from a separate anonymous NYC resident random-digit-dialing survey (2002) and linked with baseline data by zip code. Descriptive statistics and multilevel modeling were used to identify factors associated with peer recruitment. After adjustment, recruiting each additional eligible peer recruit was associated with receiving additional recruitment coupons, RDST attendance, and a greater proportion of community residents in one's recruitment neighborhood believing that clean needles should be made available to IDUs; heroin use was negatively associated with recruiting additional eligible peers. After adjustment, recruiting each additional peer (regardless of eligibility) was associated with receiving additional recruitment coupons and RDST attendance. Our data highlight the importance of neighborhood factors and suggest that RDS may not be as effective in areas characterized by negative attitudes about drug use. Group-facilitated recruitment training sessions may help counter negative social norms when implementing RDS in drug user studies.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the geographic coverage and spatial clustering of illicit drug users recruited through respondent-driven sampling in New York City.J Urban Health. 2015 Apr;92(2):352-78. doi: 10.1007/s11524-015-9937-4. J Urban Health. 2015. PMID: 25694223 Free PMC article.
-
Does respondent driven sampling alter the social network composition and health-seeking behaviors of illicit drug users followed prospectively?PLoS One. 2011 May 6;6(5):e19615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019615. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21573122 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative analysis of peer recruitment pressures in respondent driven sampling: Are risks above the ethical limit?Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Sep;26(9):832-42. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.05.027. Epub 2015 Jun 7. Int J Drug Policy. 2015. PMID: 26141164 Free PMC article.
-
Subpopulations of illicit drug users reached by targeted street outreach and respondent-driven sampling strategies: implications for research and public health practice.Ann Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;21(4):280-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.11.007. Ann Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21376275 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing respondent-driven sampling and targeted sampling methods of recruiting injection drug users in San Francisco.J Urban Health. 2010 Sep;87(5):839-50. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9486-9. J Urban Health. 2010. PMID: 20582573 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The importance of measuring and accounting for potential biases in respondent-driven samples.AIDS Behav. 2013 Jul;17(6):2244-52. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0451-y. AIDS Behav. 2013. PMID: 23515641 Free PMC article.
-
Descriptive Aspects of Injection Drug Users in Iran's National Harm Reduction Program by Methadone Maintenance Treatment.Iran J Public Health. 2013 Jun 1;42(6):588-93. eCollection 2013. Iran J Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23967426 Free PMC article.
-
Drug use Discrimination Predicts Formation of High-Risk Social Networks: Examining Social Pathways of Discrimination.AIDS Behav. 2017 Sep;21(9):2659-2669. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1639-8. AIDS Behav. 2017. PMID: 28025736 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of name and age data provided about network members in a social network study of people who use drugs: implications for constructing sociometric networks.Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;26(11):802-809. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Oct 5. Ann Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 28126091 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics and health service utilization in two samples of young injection drug users recruited using direct and referral methods in San Francisco, California.J Alcohol Drug Depend. 2013 Aug;1(5):126. doi: 10.4172/2329-6488.1000126. J Alcohol Drug Depend. 2013. PMID: 26236757 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources