Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2011 Nov;62(4):243-50.
doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2011.05.001.

Osteoporosis Canada 2010 guidelines for the assessment of fracture risk

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Osteoporosis Canada 2010 guidelines for the assessment of fracture risk

Brian Lentle et al. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2011 Nov.

Erratum in

  • Can Assoc Radiol J. 2012 May;63(2):78

Abstract

Osteoporosis Canada's 2010 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis in Canada focus on the clinical impact of fragility fractures, and on the assessment and management of women and men at high risk for fragility fracture. These guidelines now integrate a 10-year absolute fracture risk prediction into an overall management approach by using validated risk assessment tools. There currently is a large gap between optimal practices and those that are now being provided to Canadians with osteoporosis. These guidelines are part of a concerted effort to close this gap. Key changes from the 2002 guidelines of interest and relevance to radiologists are highlighted in this report.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An integrated approach to management of patients who are at risk for fracture. Dashed arrow indicates that evidence for benefit from pharmaco-therapy is not as strong in this instance as for other recommendations. BMD = bone mineral density. Reprinted from Papaioannou et al [7] with permission from CMAJ. © 2010 Canadian Medical Association.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk and its role in screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Geneva: WHO; 1994. p. 5. Technical Report Series, no. 843.
    1. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, et al. The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:417–27. - PubMed
    1. Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N, et al. Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:897–904. - PubMed
    1. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:18–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen P, Krege JH, Adachi JD, et al. Vertebral fracture status and the World Health Organization risk factors for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:495–502. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding