Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Sep;41(3):300-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.021.

Evaluation of an Internet-based alcohol misuse prevention course for college freshmen: findings of a randomized multi-campus trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of an Internet-based alcohol misuse prevention course for college freshmen: findings of a randomized multi-campus trial

Mallie J Paschall et al. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Internet-based alcohol misuse prevention programs are now used by many universities. One popular 2- to 3-hour online course known as AlcoholEdu for College is typically required for all incoming freshmen and thus constitutes a campus-level strategy to reduce student alcohol misuse.

Purpose: Multi-campus study to evaluate the effectiveness of an Internet-based alcohol misuse prevention course.

Design: RCT with 30 universities: 21 entered the study in Fall 2007, nine in Fall 2008. Fifteen were randomly assigned to receive the online course and the other 15 were assigned to the control condition. The course was implemented by intervention schools during the late summer and/or fall semester. Cross-sectional surveys of freshmen were conducted at each university, beginning prior to the intervention in Spring 2008-2009; post-intervention surveys were administered in Fall 2008-2009 and Spring 2009-2010.

Setting/participants: Public and private universities of varying sizes across the U.S. Random samples of 200 freshmen per campus were invited to participate in online surveys for the evaluation. Overall survey response rates ranged from 44% to 48% (M ≈ 90 participants per campus).

Intervention: The online course includes five modules; the first four (Part I) are typically offered in the late summer before matriculation, and the fifth (Part II) in early fall. Course content includes defining a standard drink, physiologic effects of alcohol, the need to monitor blood alcohol level, social influences on alcohol use, alcohol laws, personalized normative feedback, and alcohol harm-reduction strategies. Students must pass an exam after Part I to advance to Part II.

Main outcome measures: Past-30-day alcohol use, average number of drinks per occasion, and binge drinking.

Results: Multilevel intent-to-treat analyses indicated significant reductions in the frequency of past-30-day alcohol use (beta = -0.64, p<0.05) and binge drinking (beta = -0.26, p<0.05) during the fall semester immediately after completion of the course. However, these effects did not persist when assessed in the spring semester. Post hoc comparisons suggested stronger course effects on these outcomes at colleges with higher rates of student course completion. No course effects were observed for average number of drinks per occasion or prevalence of binge drinking, regardless of the campus course completion rate.

Conclusions: This study provides initial evidence that the Internet-based alcohol misuse prevention course has beneficial short-term effects on hazardous drinking behavior among first-year college students, which should be reinforced through effective environmental prevention strategies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01382979.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Consort flow chart illustrating study design
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trends in the frequency of past-30-day alcohol use and binge drinking Note: Adjusted means, by study condition (a, b) and level of student participation in the online course (c, d)

References

    1. Hingson RW, Zha W, Weitzman ER. Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18–24, 1998–2005. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 16:12–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson TF, Toomey TL, Lenk KM, Erickson DJ, Winters KC. Implemenation of NIAAA college drinking task force recommendations: how are colleges doing 6 years later? Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34:1687–1693. - PubMed
    1. Dimeff LA, Baer J, Kivlahan DR, Marlatt GA. Brief alcohol screening and intervention for college students: a harm reduction approach. New York: Guilford; 1999.
    1. Larimer ME, Cronce JM. Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999–2006. Addict Behav. 2007;32:2439–2468. - PubMed
    1. Walters ST, Vader AM, Harris TR. A controlled trial of web-based feedback for heavy drinking college students. Prev Sci. 2007;8:83–88. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data